Cuenca-Estrella Manuel
Servicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ctra Majadahonda-Pozuelo Km 2, 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Nov;54(5):854-69. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh434. Epub 2004 Sep 16.
Concurrent or sequential antifungal treatment for invasive mycoses has been typically considered as an option to improve results of monotherapy. However, data on the efficacy of combination therapy are sparse and consist largely of results from studies in vitro and experimental animal models. These studies have yielded controversial results depending on the criteria used to evaluate the antifungal interaction. Several combinations that showed synergy in vitro failed to do so in animal models. Overall, apart from cryptococcal infections, combined antifungal therapy is not significantly better than monotherapy in terms of clinical efficacy. It is questionable whether combination therapy should be used in most cases as there is a lack of evidence from well-designed clinical trials. However, combination therapy could be an alternative to monotherapy for patients with invasive infections that are difficult to treat, such as those due to multi-resistant species and for those who fail to respond to standard treatment.
侵袭性真菌病的联合或序贯抗真菌治疗通常被视为改善单一疗法效果的一种选择。然而,关于联合治疗疗效的数据稀少,且大多来自体外研究和实验动物模型的结果。根据用于评估抗真菌相互作用的标准,这些研究得出了有争议的结果。几种在体外显示协同作用的联合用药在动物模型中却并非如此。总体而言,除隐球菌感染外,联合抗真菌治疗在临床疗效方面并不比单一疗法显著更好。由于缺乏精心设计的临床试验证据,在大多数情况下联合治疗是否应被使用值得怀疑。然而,对于侵袭性感染难以治疗的患者,如由多重耐药菌引起的感染患者以及对标准治疗无反应的患者,联合治疗可能是单一疗法的替代选择。