Sekerli Murat, Del Negro Christopher A, Lee Robert H, Butera Robert J
Laboratory for Neuroengineering and the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0250, USA.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Sep;51(9):1665-72. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827531.
The estimation of action potential thresholds is a subjective process, which we quantified by surveying experienced electrophysiologists via a software application that allowed them to select action potential thresholds from several presented neuronal time series. Independent of this survey, we derived two nonparametric techniques for automating the detection of an action potential threshold from the time-series of intracellular recordings. Both methods start with a phase-space representation of the action potential (dV/dt versus V). Method I detects the maximum slope in the phase space, while Method II detects the maximum second derivative in the phase space. These two methods, as well as five additional methods in the literature, were tested on three data sets representing a variety of action potential shapes, the same three datasets that were used in the electrophysiologist survey. The database of user responses was used to provide an external benchmark against which to statistically evaluate all seven methods. Method II, as well as the curvature-based Methods VI and VII, provided the best results tracking both absolute and relative changes in threshold versus the other nonparametric methods (peak of second and third time derivatives). The one parametric method evaluated, detection of threshold crossing of the first temporal derivative, performed comparably to these methods, provided that an appropriate threshold was chosen. We conclude that Methods II, VI, and VII were the best methods evaluated due to their performance across a wide range of action potential shapes and the fact that they are nonparametric. Our user database of responses may be useful to other investigators interested in developing additional methods in that it quantifies what has often been a subjective estimate.
动作电位阈值的估计是一个主观过程,我们通过一个软件应用程序对经验丰富的电生理学家进行调查来量化这一过程,该软件允许他们从几个呈现的神经元时间序列中选择动作电位阈值。独立于这项调查,我们推导了两种非参数技术,用于从细胞内记录的时间序列中自动检测动作电位阈值。两种方法都从动作电位的相空间表示(dV/dt对V)开始。方法I检测相空间中的最大斜率,而方法II检测相空间中的最大二阶导数。这两种方法以及文献中的另外五种方法,在代表各种动作电位形状的三个数据集上进行了测试,这三个数据集与电生理学家调查中使用的数据集相同。用户响应数据库用于提供一个外部基准,据此对所有七种方法进行统计评估。方法II以及基于曲率的方法VI和VII,在跟踪阈值的绝对和相对变化方面比其他非参数方法(二阶和三阶时间导数的峰值)提供了更好的结果。所评估的一种参数方法,即检测一阶时间导数的阈值交叉,只要选择了合适的阈值,其性能与这些方法相当。我们得出结论,方法II、VI和VII是所评估的最佳方法,因为它们在广泛的动作电位形状范围内表现良好,并且它们是非参数的。我们的用户响应数据库可能对其他有兴趣开发其他方法的研究人员有用,因为它量化了通常是主观估计的内容。