Suppr超能文献

致命对话:细胞核与线粒体的相互作用

Deadly conversations: nuclear-mitochondrial cross-talk.

作者信息

Dawson Valina L, Dawson Ted M

机构信息

Institute for Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2004 Aug;36(4):287-94. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBB.0000041755.22613.8d.

Abstract

Neuronal damage following stroke or neurodegenerative diseases is thought to stem in part from overexcitation of N -methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors by glutamate. NMDA receptors triggered neurotoxicity is mediated in large part by activation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and production of nitric oxide (NO). Simultaneous production of superoxide anion in mitochondria provides a permissive environment for the formation of peroxynitrite (ONOO-). Peroxynitrite damages DNA leading to strand breaks and activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1). This signal cascade plays a key role in NMDA excitotoxicity, and experimental models of stroke and Parkinson's disease. The mechanisms of PARP-1-mediated neuronal death are just being revealed. While decrements in ATP and NAD are readily observed following PARP activation, it is not yet clear whether loss of ATP and NAD contribute to the neuronal death cascade or are simply a biochemical marker for PARP-1 activation. Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) is normally localized to mitochondria but following PARP-1 activation, AIF translocates to the nucleus triggering chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation and nuclear shrinkage. Additionally, phosphatidylserine is exposed and at a later time point cytochrome c is released and caspase-3 is activated. In the setting of excitotoxic neuronal death, AIF toxicity is caspase independent. These observations are consistent with reports of biochemical features of apoptosis in neuronal injury models but modest to no protection by caspase inhibitors. It is likely that AIF is the effector of the morphologic and biochemical events and is the commitment point to neuronal cell death, events that occur prior to caspase activation, thus accounting for the limited effects of caspase inhibitors. There exists significant cross talk between the nucleus and mitochondria, ultimately resulting in neuronal cell death. In exploiting this pathway for the development of new therapeutics, it will be important to block AIF translocation from the mitochondria to the nucleus without impairing important physiological functions of AIF in the mitochondria.

摘要

中风或神经退行性疾病后的神经元损伤被认为部分源于谷氨酸对N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体的过度激活。NMDA受体触发的神经毒性在很大程度上是由神经元型一氧化氮合酶(nNOS)的激活和一氧化氮(NO)的产生介导的。线粒体中同时产生的超氧阴离子为过氧亚硝酸盐(ONOO-)的形成提供了有利环境。过氧亚硝酸盐会损伤DNA,导致链断裂并激活聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶-1(PARP-1)。这一信号级联在NMDA兴奋性毒性以及中风和帕金森病的实验模型中起关键作用。PARP-1介导的神经元死亡机制刚刚被揭示。虽然PARP激活后很容易观察到ATP和NAD的减少,但目前尚不清楚ATP和NAD的损失是导致神经元死亡级联反应,还是仅仅是PARP-1激活的生化标志物。凋亡诱导因子(AIF)通常定位于线粒体,但在PARP-1激活后,AIF会转移到细胞核,触发染色质浓缩、DNA片段化和核收缩。此外,磷脂酰丝氨酸会暴露,随后细胞色素c会释放,半胱天冬酶-3会被激活。在兴奋性毒性神经元死亡的情况下,AIF毒性是不依赖半胱天冬酶的。这些观察结果与神经元损伤模型中细胞凋亡的生化特征报告一致,但半胱天冬酶抑制剂的保护作用适度或无保护作用。AIF可能是形态学和生化事件的效应器,是神经元细胞死亡的关键节点,这些事件发生在半胱天冬酶激活之前,因此解释了半胱天冬酶抑制剂的有限作用。细胞核和线粒体之间存在显著的相互作用,最终导致神经元细胞死亡。在利用这一途径开发新疗法时,重要的是在不损害AIF在线粒体中的重要生理功能的情况下,阻断AIF从线粒体向细胞核的转移。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验