Devoto Martín H, Zaffaroni Maria C, Bernardini Francesco P, de Conciliis Carlo
Consultores Oftalmológicos, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Sep;20(5):358-61. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000134274.46764.fc.
To evaluate the appearance of the skin incision in external dacryocystorhinostomy 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery.
A prospective, interventional, noncomparative case series of consecutive cases of external dacryocystorhinostomy was performed by 3 surgeons. At 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery, patients were asked to grade their incision, and standardized photographs were evaluated by 3 blinded observers.
Thirty-four consecutive patients were admitted and followed for 6 months. Six weeks after surgery, 9 of 34 patients could not see their incision site (26%), 13 of 34 graded it as minimally visible (38%), 9 of 34 (26%) graded it as moderately visible, and 3 of 34 patients (9%) graded it as very visible (grade 3). Two of 34 patients (6%) were not satisfied with the appearance of the incision. Six months after surgery, 15 of 34 patients (44%) could not see their incision site (grade 0), 16 of 34 (47%) graded it as minimally visible, 3 of 34 patients (9%) graded it as moderately visible, and no patient graded it as very visible. All patients were satisfied with the appearance of their incision. Photographic evaluation of patients 6 weeks after surgery by the 3 observers showed an average score of 1.12, 1.18, and 1.24. There was not a statistically significant difference between the observers (p = 0.95). At 6 months after surgery, the average scores were 0.56, 0.74, and 0.79. There was not a statistically significant difference between the observers (p = 0.43). The change in appearance of the incision at 6 weeks and at 6 months was statistically significant (p < 0.044), as evaluated by patients and observers (p < 0.001).
The skin incision in external dacryocystorhinostomy is satisfactory to most patients. Its appearance is improved with time; 86% of the incisions were graded invisible or minimally visible by observers and 91% by patients after 6 months.
评估外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术后6周和6个月时皮肤切口的外观。
3名外科医生对连续的外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术病例进行了一项前瞻性、干预性、非对照病例系列研究。在术后6周和6个月时,要求患者对其切口进行分级,并由3名不知情的观察者对标准化照片进行评估。
34例连续患者入院并随访6个月。术后6周时,34例患者中有9例看不见其切口部位(26%),34例中有13例将其评为勉强可见(38%),34例中有9例(26%)评为中度可见,34例患者中有3例(9%)评为非常明显可见(3级)。34例患者中有2例(6%)对切口外观不满意。术后6个月时,34例患者中有15例(44%)看不见其切口部位(0级),34例中有16例(47%)评为勉强可见,34例患者中有3例(9%)评为中度可见,无患者评为非常明显可见。所有患者对其切口外观均满意。3名观察者对术后6周患者的照片评估显示平均得分为1.12、1.18和1.24。观察者之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.95)。术后6个月时,平均得分分别为0.56、0.74和0.79。观察者之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.43)。患者和观察者评估显示,术后6周和6个月时切口外观的变化具有统计学显著性(p < 0.044)(p < 0.001)。
外路泪囊鼻腔吻合术的皮肤切口对大多数患者来说是令人满意的。其外观随时间改善;6个月后,观察者将86%的切口评为不可见或勉强可见,患者评为91%。