Stepanikova Irena, Cook Karen S
Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Med Care. 2004 Oct;42(10):966-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200410000-00005.
Little is known about whether some features of managed care widen disparities in patients' evaluations of primary care.
We investigated whether the magnitudes of racial and ethnic/language-based differences in patients' evaluations of the quality of primary care vary by capitation and gatekeeping.
We used a telephone survey of a representative sample of the US noninstitutionalized population, Community Tracking Study Household Survey 1998-1999, and Followback Survey of respondents' insurance administrators.
Our sample was privately insured adults who saw a physician at least once during the year preceding the interview and whose last visit was to a primary care physician.
We measured patients' evaluations of (1) how well the physician listened, (2) how well the physician explained, and (3) how thorough and careful the physician was during the last visit.
Significant white-minority differences emerge more often in plans using capitation or gatekeeping than in other plans. The gaps in patients' evaluations of their primary care providers' (PCP) explanations and thoroughness between whites and Hispanics interviewed in English are larger when the PCP is capitated than when the PCP is not capitated. The gap in the evaluations of their PCP's explanations by whites and Hispanics interviewed in English is larger in plans that require referrals for specialist visits than in other plans. The magnitude of racial and ethnic/language-based gaps for Hispanics interviewed in Spanish, blacks, and Native American/Asian/Pacific Islanders do not differ by capitation and gatekeeping.
English-speaking Hispanics' perceptions of the quality of primary care may be more dissimilar from whites' when capitation or gatekeeping are used than when these policies are not used.
关于管理式医疗的某些特征是否会扩大患者对初级医疗评价中的差异,我们了解得很少。
我们调查了患者对初级医疗质量评价中基于种族和族裔/语言的差异程度是否因按人头付费和守门人制度而异。
我们对美国非机构化人口的代表性样本进行了电话调查,即1998 - 1999年社区追踪研究家庭调查以及对受访者保险管理人员的回访调查。
我们的样本是在访谈前一年至少看过一次医生且最后一次就诊是看初级保健医生的私人保险成年人。
我们测量了患者对以下方面的评价:(1)医生倾听的程度;(2)医生解释的程度;(3)医生在上次就诊时的彻底性和细心程度。
与其他计划相比,在采用按人头付费或守门人制度的计划中,白人与少数族裔之间的显著差异更常出现。当初级保健医生按人头付费时,以英语接受访谈的白人和西班牙裔患者对其初级保健提供者(PCP)解释和彻底性评价的差距大于初级保健医生不按人头付费时。在需要转诊才能看专科医生的计划中,以英语接受访谈的白人和西班牙裔患者对其初级保健医生解释评价的差距大于其他计划。对于以西班牙语接受访谈的西班牙裔、黑人以及美国原住民/亚裔/太平洋岛民,基于种族和族裔/语言的差距大小不因按人头付费和守门人制度而有所不同。
与不采用这些政策时相比,采用按人头付费或守门人制度时,讲英语的西班牙裔对初级医疗质量的看法可能与白人的看法差异更大。