Weech-Maldonado Robert, Morales Leo S, Elliott Marc, Spritzer Karen, Marshall Grant, Hays Ron D
Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16801, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):789-808. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00147.
Consumer assessments of health care provide important information about how well health plans and clinicians meet the needs of the people they serve. The purpose of this study was to examine whether consumer reports and ratings of care in Medicaid managed care vary by race/ethnicity and language.
Data were derived from the National CAHPS Benchmarking Database (NCBD) 3.0 and consisted of 49,327 adults enrolled in Medicaid managed care plans in 14 states in 2000.
The CAHPS data were collected by telephone and mail. Surveys were administered in Spanish and English. The response rate across plans was 38 percent.
Data were analyzed using linear regression models. The dependent variables were CAHPS 2.0 global rating items (personal doctor, specialist, health care, health plan) and multi-item reports of care (getting needed care, timeliness of care, provider communication, staff helpfulness, plan service). The independent variables were race/ethnicity, language spoken at home (English, Spanish, Other), and survey language (English or Spanish). Survey respondents were assigned to one of nine racial/ethnic categories based on Hispanic ethnicity and race: White, Hispanic/Latino, Black/African American, Asian/Pacific Islanders, American Indian/Alaskan native, American Indian/White, Black/White, Other Multiracial, Other Race/Ethnicity. Whites, Asians, and Hispanics were further classified into language subgroups based on the survey language and based on the language primarily spoken at home. Covariates included gender, age, education, and self-rated health.
Racial/ethnic and linguistic minorities tended to report worse care than did whites. Linguistic minorities reported worse care than did racial and ethnic minorities.
This study suggests that racial and ethnic minorities and persons with limited English proficiency face barriers to care, despite Medicaid-enabled financial access. Health care organizations should address the observed disparities in access to care for racial/ethnic and linguistic minorities as part of their quality improvement efforts.
消费者对医疗保健的评估提供了关于健康计划和临床医生满足其所服务人群需求程度的重要信息。本研究的目的是检验医疗补助管理式医疗中消费者对医疗服务的报告和评级是否因种族/族裔和语言而异。
数据源自国家医疗保健消费者评估基准数据库(NCBD)3.0,包括2000年在14个州参加医疗补助管理式医疗计划的49327名成年人。
医疗保健消费者评估(CAHPS)数据通过电话和邮件收集。调查问卷以西班牙语和英语进行。各计划的回复率为38%。
使用线性回归模型分析数据。因变量是CAHPS 2.0总体评级项目(私人医生、专科医生、医疗保健、健康计划)和多项医疗服务报告(获得所需护理、护理及时性、提供者沟通、工作人员帮助程度、计划服务)。自变量是种族/族裔、在家说的语言(英语、西班牙语、其他)以及调查语言(英语或西班牙语)。根据西班牙裔族裔和种族,调查受访者被分为九个种族/族裔类别之一:白人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔、黑人/非裔美国人、亚裔/太平洋岛民、美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、美洲印第安人/白人、黑人/白人、其他多种族、其他种族/族裔。白人、亚裔和西班牙裔根据调查语言以及在家主要说的语言进一步分为语言亚组。协变量包括性别、年龄、教育程度和自评健康状况。
种族/族裔和语言少数群体报告的护理情况往往比白人差。语言少数群体报告的护理情况比种族和族裔少数群体差。
本研究表明,尽管有医疗补助带来的经济可及性,但种族和族裔少数群体以及英语水平有限的人在获得护理方面面临障碍。医疗保健组织应将观察到的种族/族裔和语言少数群体在获得护理方面的差异作为其质量改进工作的一部分加以解决。