Gacioch G M, Ellis S G, Lee L, Bates E R, Kirsh M, Walton J A, Topol E J
Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Mar 1;19(3):647-53. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80286-4.
Conventional therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction continues to be associated with a high in-hospital mortality rate. Hemodynamic support with new mechanical devices and emergency coronary revascularization may alter the long-term prognosis for patients with this complication. Between July 1985 and March 1990, 68 patients presented to the University of Michigan with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Interventions performed included thrombolytic therapy (46%), intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation (70%), cardiac catheterization (86%), coronary angioplasty (73%), emergency coronary artery bypass grafting/ventricular septal defect repair (15%), Hemopump insertion (11%), percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (4%) and ventricular assist device (3%). The 30-day survival rate was significantly better in patients who had successful angioplasty of the infarct-related artery than in patients with failed angioplasty (61% vs. 7%, p = 0.002) or no attempt at angioplasty (61% vs. 14%, p = 0.003). This difference was maintained over the 1-year follow-up period. The only clinical variable that predicted survival was age less than 65 years. The early use of the new support devices in 10 patients was associated with death in 8 (80%), but this poor outcome may reflect a selection bias for an especially high risk population. Collectively, these recent data continue to suggest that emergency revascularization with angioplasty may reduce the mortality rate, but further study is required to define optimal utilization and integration of new support devices.
急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的传统治疗方法的院内死亡率仍然很高。使用新型机械装置进行血流动力学支持和紧急冠状动脉血运重建可能会改变患有这种并发症患者的长期预后。1985年7月至1990年3月期间,68例急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的患者被送到密歇根大学。实施的干预措施包括溶栓治疗(46%)、主动脉内球囊反搏(70%)、心导管检查(86%)、冠状动脉成形术(73%)、紧急冠状动脉搭桥术/室间隔缺损修复(15%)、Hemopump置入(11%)、经皮心肺支持(4%)和心室辅助装置(3%)。梗死相关动脉血管成形术成功的患者30天生存率明显高于血管成形术失败的患者(61%对7%,p = 0.002)或未尝试血管成形术的患者(61%对14%,p = 0.003)。这种差异在1年的随访期内一直存在。唯一能预测生存的临床变量是年龄小于65岁。10例早期使用新型支持装置的患者中有8例(80%)死亡,但这种不良结果可能反映了对特别高危人群的选择偏倚。总体而言,这些最新数据继续表明,血管成形术进行紧急血运重建可能会降低死亡率,但需要进一步研究来确定新型支持装置的最佳使用和整合方式。