Hauck Loran D, Adler Lee M, Mulla Zuber D
Adventist Health System, Orlando, FL, USA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;14(9):669-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.01.003.
To examine the impact of a unique evidence-based clinical pathway on six outcomes of care in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
A retrospective cohort study of CAP patients discharged between January 1999 and December 2001, from 31 Adventist Health System institutions nationwide. A total of 22,196 records were available for multivariate analyses. Odds ratios (OR) for the outcomes were calculated and stratified by a unique severity score. The severity score ranged from 1 to 5, where 5 indicated the most severe condition.
Pathway patients were significantly less likely to die in-hospital compared with non-pathway patients in four of the five severity strata (OR in severity level 1=0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.70). In all severity strata, pathway patients were approximately twice as likely as non-pathway patients to receive blood cultures and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Among patients who were classified as severity level 1, pathway patients experienced an 80% reduction in the odds of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (OR=0.20; 95% CI, 0.12-0.33).
Patients who were placed on pneumonia clinical pathway care were much more likely than non-pathway patients to have favorable outcomes of care.
探讨一种独特的循证临床路径对因社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者六项护理结局的影响。
对1999年1月至2001年12月期间从全国31家基督复临安息日会医疗系统机构出院的CAP患者进行回顾性队列研究。共有22196份记录可用于多变量分析。计算结局的比值比(OR),并按一种独特的严重程度评分进行分层。严重程度评分范围为1至5,其中5表示最严重的病情。
在五个严重程度分层中的四个分层中,与未采用路径的患者相比,采用路径的患者院内死亡的可能性显著降低(严重程度1级的OR = 0.37;95%置信区间[CI],0.20 - 0.70)。在所有严重程度分层中,采用路径的患者接受血培养和适当抗生素治疗的可能性约为未采用路径患者的两倍。在被分类为严重程度1级的患者中,采用路径的患者发生需要机械通气的呼吸衰竭的几率降低了80%(OR = 0.20;95% CI,0.12 - 0.33)。
接受肺炎临床路径护理的患者比未采用路径的患者更有可能获得良好的护理结局。