Eilber Fritz C, Eilber Frederick R, Eckardt Jeffery, Rosen Gerald, Riedel Elyn, Maki Robert G, Brennan Murray F, Singer Samuel
Departments of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):686-95; discussion 695-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141710.74073.0d.
To determine if chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma.
The impact of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma is controversial and its effect on individual histologic subtypes is not defined.
Two prospectively collected sarcoma databases were used to identify all patients with >5 cm, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma that underwent surgical treatment of cure from 1975 to 2003 (n = 245). Clinical, pathologic and treatment variables were analyzed for disease-specific survival (DSS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS).
Sixty-three (26%) patients were treated with ifosfamide based chemotherapy (IF), 83 (34%) with doxorubicin based chemotherapy (DOX) and 99 (40%) received no chemotherapy (NoC). To assess the impact of DOX, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1975 to 1990 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the DOX treated patients was 64% (53%-74%) compared with 56% (51%-79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.28). To assess the impact of IF, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1990 to 2003 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the IF treated patients was 92% (84%-100%) compared with 65% (51%-79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.0003). Independent prognostic factors for improved DSS were smaller size (HR = 0.7, P = 0.01), myxoid/round cell histologic subtype (HR = 0.3, P = 0.03) and treatment with IF (HR = 0.3, P = 0.01). The five-year DRFS of the IF treated patients was 81% (70%-92%) compared with 63% (50%-76%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.02). The 5 year LRFS of the IF treated patients was 86% (76%-96%) compared with 87% (77%-97%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.99).
In patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma; DOX is not associated with improved DSS and IF is associated with an improved DSS. Treatment with IF should be considered in patients with high-risk primary extremity liposarcoma.
确定化疗对大型、高级别原发性肢体脂肪肉瘤患者是否具有生存获益。
化疗对原发性肢体软组织肉瘤患者生存的影响存在争议,其对各个组织学亚型的影响尚不明确。
使用两个前瞻性收集的肉瘤数据库,识别出1975年至2003年间接受根治性手术治疗的所有直径>5 cm、高级别原发性肢体脂肪肉瘤患者(n = 245)。分析临床、病理和治疗变量,以评估疾病特异性生存(DSS)、远处无复发生存(DRFS)和局部无复发生存(LRFS)情况。
63例(26%)患者接受了基于异环磷酰胺的化疗(IF),83例(34%)接受了基于阿霉素的化疗(DOX),99例(40%)未接受化疗(NoC)。为评估DOX的影响,对1975年至1990年接受治疗的患者进行了当代队列分析。接受DOX治疗患者的5年DSS为64%(53%-74%),而未接受化疗患者为56%(51%-79%)(对数秩P值 = 0.28)。为评估IF的影响,对1990年至2003年接受治疗的患者进行了当代队列分析。接受IF治疗患者的5年DSS为92%(84%-100%),而未接受化疗患者为65%(51%-79%)(对数秩P值 = 0.0003)。DSS改善的独立预后因素为肿瘤较小(HR = 0.7,P = 0.01)、黏液样/圆形细胞组织学亚型(HR = 0.3,P = 0.03)以及接受IF治疗(HR = 0.3,P = 0.01)。接受IF治疗患者的五年DRFS为81%(70%-92%),而未接受化疗患者为63%(50%-76%)(对数秩P值 = 0.02)。接受IF治疗患者的5年LRFS为86%(76%-96%),而未接受化疗患者为87%(77%-97%)(对数秩P值 = 0.99)。
对于大型、高级别原发性肢体脂肪肉瘤患者;DOX与DSS改善无关,而IF与DSS改善相关。高危原发性肢体脂肪肉瘤患者应考虑接受IF治疗。