Frustaci S, Gherlinzoni F, De Paoli A, Bonetti M, Azzarelli A, Comandone A, Olmi P, Buonadonna A, Pignatti G, Barbieri E, Apice G, Zmerly H, Serraino D, Picci P
Unità Operativa di Oncologia Medica and di Oncologia Radioterapica and the Servizio di Epidemiologia, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy. sfrustaci.cro.it
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1238-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1238.
Adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma is controversial because previous trials reported conflicting results. The present study was designed with restricted selection criteria and high dose-intensities of the two most active chemotherapeutic agents.
Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with grade 3 to 4 spindle-cell sarcomas (primary diameter > or = 5 cm or any size recurrent tumor) in extremities or girdles were eligible. Stratification was by primary versus recurrent tumors and by tumor diameter greater than or equal to 10 cm versus less than 10 cm. One hundred four patients were randomized, 51 to the control group and 53 to the treatment group (five cycles of 4'-epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2 and ifosfamide 1.8 g/m(2) days 1 through 5, with hydration, mesna, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor).
After a median follow-up of 59 months, 60 patients had relapsed and 48 died (28 and 20 in the treatment arm and 32 and 28 in the control arm, respectively). The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 48 months in the treatment group and 16 months in the control group (P =.04); and the median overall survival (OS) was 75 months for treated and 46 months for untreated patients (P =.03). For OS, the absolute benefit deriving from chemotherapy was 13% at 2 years and increased to 19% at 4 years (P =.04).
Intensified adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive impact on the DFS and OS of patients with high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcomas at a median follow-up of 59 months. Therefore, our data favor an intensified treatment in similar cases. Although cure is still difficult to achieve, a significant delay in death is worthwhile, also considering the short duration of treatment and the absence of toxic deaths.
软组织肉瘤的辅助化疗存在争议,因为既往试验报告的结果相互矛盾。本研究采用严格的入选标准和两种最有效的化疗药物的高剂量强度进行设计。
年龄在18至65岁之间,肢体或带骨有3至4级梭形细胞肉瘤(原发直径≥5 cm或任何大小的复发性肿瘤)的患者符合条件。分层依据为原发肿瘤与复发性肿瘤,以及肿瘤直径≥10 cm与<10 cm。104例患者被随机分组,51例进入对照组,53例进入治疗组(五个周期,第1天和第2天给予表柔比星60 mg/m²,第1至5天给予异环磷酰胺1.8 g/m²,并进行水化、使用美司钠和粒细胞集落刺激因子)。
中位随访59个月后,60例患者复发,48例死亡(治疗组分别为28例和20例,对照组分别为32例和28例)。治疗组的中位无病生存期(DFS)为48个月,对照组为16个月(P = 0.04);治疗患者的中位总生存期(OS)为75个月,未治疗患者为46个月(P = 0.03)。对于OS,化疗在2年时的绝对获益为13%,4年时增至19%(P = 0.04)。
在中位随访59个月时,强化辅助化疗对高危肢体软组织肉瘤患者的DFS和OS有积极影响。因此,我们的数据支持在类似病例中进行强化治疗。虽然仍难以实现治愈,但考虑到治疗时间短且无毒性死亡,显著延迟死亡是值得的。