Poon Ronnie T, Fan Sheung Tat, Lo Chung Mau, Liu Chi Leung, Lam Chi Ming, Yuen Wai Key, Yeung Chun, Wong John
Centre for the Study of Liver Disease and Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):698-708; discussion 708-10. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141195.66155.0c.
To assess the trends in perioperative outcome of hepatectomy for hepatobiliary diseases.
Data of 1222 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatobiliary diseases from July 1989 to June 2003 in a tertiary institution were collected prospectively. Perioperative outcome of patients in the first (group I) and second (group II) halves of this period was compared. Factors associated with morbidity and mortality were analyzed.
Diagnoses included hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 734), other liver cancers (n = 257), extrahepatic biliary malignancies (n = 43), hepatolithiasis (n = 101), benign liver tumors (n = 61), and other diseases (n = 26). The majority of patients (61.8%) underwent major hepatectomy of > or = 3 segments. The overall hospital mortality and morbidity were 4.9% and 32.4%, respectively. The number of hepatectomies increased from 402 in group I to 820 in group II, partly as a result of more liberal patient selection. Group II had more elderly patients (P = 0.006), more patients with comorbid illnesses (P = 0.001), and significantly worse liver function. Nonetheless, group II had lower blood loss (median 750 versus 1450 mL, P < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (17.3% versus 67.7%, P < 0.001), morbidity (30.0% versus 37.3%, P = 0.012), and hospital mortality (3.7% versus 7.5%, P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine, major hepatic resection, and transfusion were the significant predictors of hospital mortality, whereas concomitant extrahepatic procedure, thrombocytopenia, and transfusion were the predictors of morbidity.
Perioperative outcome has improved despite extending the indication of hepatectomy to more high-risk patients. The role of hepatectomy in the management of hepatobiliary diseases can be expanded. Reduced perioperative transfusion is the main contributory factor for improved outcome.
评估肝胆疾病肝切除术围手术期的结果趋势。
前瞻性收集了1989年7月至2003年6月在一家三级医疗机构连续接受肝胆疾病肝切除术的1222例患者的数据。比较了该时期前半段(第一组)和后半段(第二组)患者的围手术期结果。分析了与发病率和死亡率相关的因素。
诊断包括肝细胞癌(n = 734)、其他肝癌(n = 257)、肝外胆管恶性肿瘤(n = 43)、肝内胆管结石(n = 101)、良性肝肿瘤(n = 61)和其他疾病(n = 26)。大多数患者(61.8%)接受了≥3个肝段的大肝切除术。总体医院死亡率和发病率分别为4.9%和32.4%。肝切除术的数量从第一组的402例增加到第二组的820例,部分原因是患者选择更加宽松。第二组老年患者更多(P = 0.006),合并疾病的患者更多(P = 0.001),肝功能明显更差。尽管如此,第二组的失血量更低(中位数750对1450 mL,P < 0.001)、围手术期输血率更低(17.3%对67.7%,P < 0.001)、发病率更低(30.0%对37.3%,P = 0.012)和医院死亡率更低(3.7%对7.5%,P = 0.004)。多因素分析显示,低白蛋白血症、血小板减少、血清肌酐升高、大肝切除术和输血是医院死亡率的显著预测因素,而同期肝外手术、血小板减少和输血是发病率的预测因素。
尽管将肝切除术的适应证扩大到更多高危患者,但围手术期结果仍有所改善。肝切除术在肝胆疾病治疗中的作用可以扩大。围手术期输血减少是结果改善的主要促成因素。