Suppr超能文献

癌症患儿急性化疗所致恶心和呕吐的预防:证据有哪些?

Prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children with cancer: what is the evidence?

作者信息

Antonarakis Emmanuel S, Evans Jamie L, Heard Gemma F, Noonan Lucy M, Pizer Barry L, Hain Richard D W

机构信息

University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004 Nov;43(6):651-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20138.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nausea and vomiting are preventable side effects of cancer chemotherapy for children. Antiemetics are essential, especially as treatment becomes more intensive. Many drugs are available, but adequate evidence-based recommendations are lacking. We aimed (1) to consider an evidence-based approach for pharmacological prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children, and (2) to compare this approach with antiemetic prescribing in two paediatric oncology centres.

PROCEDURE

Relevant publications (Medline, Embase, CancerLit:1966-2002) were critically evaluated using pre-defined criteria. Evidence-based statements summarising their findings were formulated, and evidence basis proposed. Current prescribing practice was then compared with this evidence basis in Welsh children under 16 receiving chemotherapy at Llandough Hospital, Cardiff or Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2001.

RESULTS

Of 213 studies retrieved, 82 provided evidence. Our evidence basis recommends combination 5HT3-antagonist/corticosteroid for highly emetogenic chemotherapy, 5HT3-antagonist alone for moderate emetogenicity, and no antiemetic for other chemotherapy. Forty-four children in Cardiff (0.6-16.9 yrs) and 14 in Liverpool (0.8-16.2 yrs) were included in the audit. Differences in prescribing practice between the centres were not significant. In 109/159 (69%) of chemotherapy courses (35, 87 and 100% of high, moderate and low emetogenicity, respectively), antiemetics were selected in accordance with evidence basis. Seventy percent of prescribed doses were as evidence basis recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

We present an evidence basis for prescribing prophylactic antiemetics to children undergoing chemotherapy. Prescribing practices in these two centres treating Welsh children were similar. Both differed from the evidence basis we propose. Deviations were greatest for regimens of high emetogenicity, where effective emetic control is most crucial.

摘要

背景

恶心和呕吐是儿童癌症化疗可预防的副作用。止吐药至关重要,尤其是随着治疗强度的增加。有多种药物可供使用,但缺乏充分的循证医学建议。我们旨在:(1)考虑采用循证医学方法预防儿童化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV),(2)将这种方法与两个儿科肿瘤中心的止吐药处方情况进行比较。

方法

使用预先确定的标准对相关出版物(Medline、Embase、CancerLit:1966 - 2002)进行严格评估。制定总结其研究结果的循证医学声明,并提出证据依据。然后将2001年1月1日至2001年12月31日期间在加的夫兰多医院或利物浦奥尔德希儿童医院接受化疗的16岁以下威尔士儿童的当前处方实践与该证据依据进行比较。

结果

在检索到的213项研究中,82项提供了证据。我们的证据依据建议,对于高致吐性化疗采用5HT3拮抗剂/皮质类固醇联合用药,对于中度致吐性化疗单独使用5HT3拮抗剂,对于其他化疗则不使用止吐药。审计纳入了加的夫的44名儿童(0.6 - 16.9岁)和利物浦的14名儿童(0.8 - 16.2岁)。两个中心的处方实践差异不显著。在109/159(69%)的化疗疗程中(高、中、低致吐性化疗分别为35%、87%和100%),止吐药的选择符合证据依据。70%的处方剂量与证据依据推荐的一致。

结论

我们为接受化疗的儿童开具预防性止吐药提供了证据依据。这两个治疗威尔士儿童的中心的处方实践相似。两者均与我们提出的证据依据不同。在高致吐性化疗方案中偏差最大,而有效的呕吐控制在高致吐性化疗中最为关键。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验