• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Double gloving. Protecting surgeons from blood contamination in the operating room.

作者信息

Quebbeman E J, Telford G L, Wadsworth K, Hubbard S, Goodman H, Gottlieb M S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1992 Feb;127(2):213-6; discussion 216-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420020103014.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420020103014
PMID:1540100
Abstract

Health care workers, particularly surgeons, understand the importance of preventing contamination from blood of patients infected with deadly viruses. One of the most common areas of contamination is the hands and fingers due to the failure of glove protection. There are varying opinions regarding the frequency of glove failure, the necessity of wearing two gloves for added protection, and the ability to operate when wearing two gloves. We performed a prospective, randomized, trial of 143 procedures involving 284 persons to answer these questions for surgeons and first assistants. Overall, the glove failure rate (blood contamination of the fingers) was 51% when one glove was worn and 7% when two gloves were worn. Acceptability was 88% in the group who agreed to wear two gloves, and 88% of these did not perceive that tactile sense was significantly impaired. We believe that double gloving should be, and can be, used routinely during major surgical procedures to protect surgeons from blood contamination.

摘要

相似文献

1
Double gloving. Protecting surgeons from blood contamination in the operating room.
Arch Surg. 1992 Feb;127(2):213-6; discussion 216-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420020103014.
2
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.双层手套可减少手术交叉感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.
3
Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.双层手套真的有保护作用吗?手术期间,比较一下单手套和双手套的手术护士手套穿孔率。
Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.017. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
4
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.术中手套穿孔——单层手套与双层手套预防皮肤污染的比较
Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458.
5
[Double gloving in reducing the interoperative risk of blood borne pathogens].[双层手套在降低手术中血源性病原体感染风险方面的作用]
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004;69(4):249-54.
6
Effectiveness of double-gloving method on prevention of surgical glove perforations and blood contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.双层手套法预防手术手套穿孔和血液污染的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Sep;77(9):3630-3643. doi: 10.1111/jan.14824. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.双层手套与单层手套在保护手术团队方面的效果比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1990 Mar;60(3):171-5.
8
Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study.胃肠手术中手套穿孔的发生率及双层手套的防护作用:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Eur J Surg. 2000 Apr;166(4):293-5. doi: 10.1080/110241500750009113.
9
Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery.腹部手术中双重手套作为自我防护措施
Eur J Surg. 1997 Mar;163(3):163-7.
10
Glove utilization in the prevention of cross transmission: a systematic review.手套在预防交叉传播中的应用:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):188-230. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1817.

引用本文的文献

1
Double gloving for self-protection in high-risk surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高风险手术中用于自我保护的双层手套:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 8;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02760-z.
2
Comparison of Unnoticed Glove Perforations during Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创与开放手术中未被注意到的手套穿孔的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 1;9(2):179. doi: 10.3390/children9020179.
3
Surgical glove perforation during laparoscopic colorectal procedures.
腹腔镜结直肠手术中手术手套穿孔。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3489-3494. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08670-0. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
4
Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines.术中手术部位感染控制与预防:WSES 腹腔感染指南的立场文件和未来增编。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb 10;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-0288-4.
5
Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel.手套、额外的手套或用于预防医护人员经皮暴露损伤的特殊类型手套。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 7;2014(3):CD009573. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009573.pub2.
6
Surgeons-Take care of pre and par-Surgical rituals.外科医生——负责术前和手术中的相关仪式。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Apr;56(2):168-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02974333.
7
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.双层手套可减少手术交叉感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2.
8
Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to standard precautions of surgeons and physicians in university-affiliated hospitals of Shiraz, Iran.伊朗设拉子大学附属医院外科医生和内科医生在标准预防措施方面的知识、态度和行为
Int J Infect Dis. 2007 May;11(3):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
9
Surgeons' risk awareness and behavioral methods of protection against bloodborne pathogen transmission during surgery.外科医生在手术过程中对血源性病原体传播的风险意识及行为防护方法。
Ann Surg. 1999 Nov;230(5):737-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199911000-00022.
10
Occupational exposure to the risk of HIV infection among health care workers in Mwanza Region, United Republic of Tanzania.坦桑尼亚联合共和国姆万扎地区医护人员职业暴露于艾滋病毒感染风险的情况。
Bull World Health Organ. 1997;75(2):133-40.