Suppr超能文献

心脏手术期间肝素管理与各种血液保护技术的关系。

Heparin management during cardiac surgery with respect to various blood-conservation techniques.

作者信息

Boldt J, Zickmann B, Herold C, Scholz S, Dapper F, Hempelmann G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Surgery. 1992 Mar;111(3):260-5.

PMID:1542853
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various methods to reduce blood consumption are used in cardiac surgery. This study was designed to investigate the influence of various blood-conservation techniques on heparin plasma levels and coagulation variables in the perioperative period.

METHODS

Anticoagulation was achieved by application of 300 units/kg bovine heparin before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Ninety patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery were randomly divided into six groups according to different blood-conservation methods: group 1, blood during and after CPB was concentrated by a cell saver (CS); group 2, blood was concentrated by means of a hemofiltration device (HF); group 3, acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) was performed in combination with the CS technique (ANH-CS); group 4, ANH was carried out in combination with an HF during CPB (ANH-HF); group 5, acute plasmapheresis (APP) was performed and a CS was used during CPB (APP-CS); and group 6, APP was used in combination with an HF device (APP-HF).

RESULTS

Heparin plasma concentration during CPB did not differ significantly among the six groups, ranging from 1.60 to 2.03 units/ml. Antagonization with protamine sulfate after termination of bypass in a 1:1 ratio decreased heparin concentration almost to baseline values. Fibrinogen concentration and antithrombin-III level were lowest in the CS group but were not decreased critically during the entire investigation period. Activated clotting time differed widely among the patients (range 383 to 807 seconds) and showed no significant correlation to heparin plasma levels. Partial thromboplastin time was higher than 300 seconds during the entire period of CPB, also indicating sufficient anticoagulation. Blood loss until day 1 after surgery was significantly most pronounced in the CS group and least in the APP-HF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The blood conservation techniques used in this study were safe with regard to sufficient anticoagulation during CPB. No insufficient antagonization with protamine could be observed in the postbypass period.

摘要

背景

心脏手术中采用了多种减少血液消耗的方法。本研究旨在探讨围手术期各种血液保护技术对肝素血浆水平和凝血变量的影响。

方法

在体外循环(CPB)前应用300单位/千克牛肝素实现抗凝。90例行冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者根据不同的血液保护方法随机分为六组:第1组,CPB期间及之后的血液通过血液回收机(CS)浓缩;第2组,血液通过血液滤过装置(HF)浓缩;第3组,急性等容血液稀释(ANH)联合CS技术(ANH-CS);第4组,CPB期间ANH联合HF(ANH-HF);第5组,进行急性血浆置换(APP)并在CPB期间使用CS(APP-CS);第6组,APP联合HF装置(APP-HF)。

结果

CPB期间六组之间肝素血浆浓度无显著差异,范围为1.60至2.03单位/毫升。体外循环结束后以1:1比例用硫酸鱼精蛋白拮抗使肝素浓度几乎降至基线值。纤维蛋白原浓度和抗凝血酶III水平在CS组最低,但在整个研究期间未显著降低。患者之间活化凝血时间差异很大(范围为383至807秒),且与肝素血浆水平无显著相关性。CPB整个期间部分凝血活酶时间均高于300秒,也表明抗凝充分。术后第1天的失血量在CS组最为显著,在APP-HF组最少。

结论

本研究中使用的血液保护技术在CPB期间抗凝充分方面是安全的。在体外循环后期间未观察到鱼精蛋白拮抗不足的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验