Fielding J A, Whitehouse G H
Clin Radiol. 1979 Jan;30(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(79)80041-0.
A comparative trial was made between two oral cholecystographic agents, iocetamic acid (Cholebrin) and iopanoic acid (Telepaque), Fifty patients were given Cholebrin and another 50 were given Telepaque by random allocation. The cholecystographic qualities of the two contrast media showed no significant difference. It was noted that contrast medium within the bowel at the time of the investigation tended to be homogeneous rather than granular with Cholebrin, and the significance of this is discussed. Gastrointestinal side-effects were common with both contrast media, but there was a significantly lower incidence of diarrhoea with Cholebrin than with Telepaque. Various biochemical parameters of hepatic and renal function were measrued in 40 random patients and showed no clinically significant alteration following ingestion of the contrast media.
对两种口服胆囊造影剂碘西酸(胆影葡胺)和碘番酸(Telepaque)进行了一项对比试验。通过随机分配,50名患者服用胆影葡胺,另外50名患者服用碘番酸。两种造影剂的胆囊造影质量无显著差异。值得注意的是,在检查时,使用胆影葡胺时肠道内的造影剂倾向于均匀分布而非呈颗粒状,对此的意义进行了讨论。两种造影剂的胃肠道副作用都很常见,但胆影葡胺引起腹泻的发生率明显低于碘番酸。对40名随机选取的患者测量了各种肝肾功能生化参数,结果显示摄入造影剂后这些参数无临床显著改变。