Suppr超能文献

膝关节假体的患者偏好

Patient preferences in knee prostheses.

作者信息

Pritchett J W

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Sep;86(7):979-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.14991.

Abstract

A total of 344 patients underwent bilateral total knee replacement (TKR) using a different prosthesis on each side. Four knee prostheses were used: anterior and posterior cruciate-retaining (ACL-PCL), posterior cruciate-retaining (PCL), medial or lateral pivot (MLP), and posterior cruciate-substituting (PS). All patients had good or excellent results. The range of movement, relief from pain, alignment, and stability did not vary among any of the prostheses. Forty-one of 46 patients (89%) preferred the ACL-PCL to the PS knee and 27 of 35 patients (77%) the MLP knee to the PS knee. Of the patients with an ACL-PCL knee on one side and a MLP on the other, an equal number preferred each type. The MLP knee was preferred to the PCL by 34 (79%) patients. PS and PCL knees were preferred equally. Patients with bilateral TKRs preferred retention of both their cruciate ligaments or substitution with a medial or lateral pivot prosthesis.

摘要

共有344例患者接受了双侧全膝关节置换术(TKR),两侧使用不同的假体。使用了四种膝关节假体:前后交叉韧带保留型(ACL-PCL)、后交叉韧带保留型(PCL)、内外侧旋转铰链型(MLP)和后交叉韧带替代型(PS)。所有患者的结果均为良好或优秀。任何一种假体在活动范围、疼痛缓解、对线和稳定性方面均无差异。46例患者中有41例(89%)更喜欢ACL-PCL膝关节而非PS膝关节,35例患者中有27例(77%)更喜欢MLP膝关节而非PS膝关节。在一侧为ACL-PCL膝关节而另一侧为MLP膝关节的患者中,喜欢每种类型的人数相等。34例(79%)患者更喜欢MLP膝关节而非PCL膝关节。PS膝关节和PCL膝关节同样受到青睐。接受双侧TKR的患者更喜欢保留两条交叉韧带或用内外侧旋转铰链假体进行替代。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验