Pratt Michael, Macera Caroline A, Sallis James F, O'Donnell Michael, Frank Lawrence D
Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Oct;27(3 Suppl):136-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.015.
Physical inactivity is responsible for major health and economic costs in the United States. Despite widespread recognition of the scope and importance of the problem of physical inactivity, only modest progress has been made in improving overall physical activity in the U.S. population. This paper applies a combined economic and public health perspective to better understand physical activity behavior and to guide a search for promising new economically oriented interventions to increase physical activity at the population level. This perspective is operationalized as the SLOTH model-a time-budget model incorporating Sleep, Leisure, Occupation, Transportation, and Home-based activities. Key economic forces that may influence individuals' choices about utilization of time and physical activity are identified. Potential interventions are proposed in response to each of the important forces and are evaluated on four criteria: (1) economic efficiency, (2) equity, (3) effectiveness, and (4) feasibility. The SLOTH model provides guidance regarding interventions that might increase physical activity in each of the four nonsleep domains. Economic intervention strategies are proposed and compared to economic and public health criteria. The results provide a starting point for selecting and evaluating potentially effective and feasible economic interventions that might be implemented as part of a larger effort to address the health crisis of inactive lifestyles and obesity.
缺乏身体活动给美国带来了巨大的健康和经济成本。尽管人们普遍认识到缺乏身体活动问题的范围和重要性,但在改善美国人口的总体身体活动方面仅取得了有限的进展。本文运用经济和公共卫生相结合的视角,以更好地理解身体活动行为,并指导寻找有前景的、以经济为导向的新干预措施,以在人群层面增加身体活动。这种视角具体化为SLOTH模型——一个包含睡眠、休闲、职业、交通和居家活动的时间预算模型。确定了可能影响个人时间利用和身体活动选择的关键经济因素。针对每个重要因素提出了潜在的干预措施,并根据四个标准进行评估:(1)经济效率,(2)公平性,(3)有效性,以及(4)可行性。SLOTH模型为可能增加四个非睡眠领域身体活动的干预措施提供了指导。提出了经济干预策略,并与经济和公共卫生标准进行了比较。研究结果为选择和评估潜在有效且可行的经济干预措施提供了一个起点,这些干预措施可作为应对缺乏运动的生活方式和肥胖健康危机的更大努力的一部分来实施。