Kilgo Patrick D, Meredith J Wayne, Hensberry Rebecca, Osler Turner M
Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
J Trauma. 2004 Sep;57(3):479-85; discussion 486-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000141024.96440.7c.
The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is widely used for anatomic severity assessments. The ISS is the sum of the squares of a patient's three worst Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severities (1-6) from three specified body regions. The set of three AIS severities (including 0s) is called a "triplet." ISS values of 9, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27, 29, 33, 34, 41, and 50 can originate from two unique triplets, but it is not clear whether the mortalities of the triplets are equal. A related question regards the monotonicity of the ISS, that is, whether mortality increases with successive values of ISS. This study sought to compare the mortality of equivalent ISS values from different triplets and to evaluate whether ISS is a monotonic function of mortality.
The ISS, its corresponding three-digit triplet, and the ICISS (an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-based competing score) were calculated for 361,381 National Trauma Data Bank patients. Fisher's exact tests were used to test for mortality differences between triplets that yield the same ISS. Plots of mortality by score value were produced to visually assess the monotonicity of the ICISS and the ISS.
Six of the 11 triplet pairs had mortalities that differed by greater than 20%, with the largest difference being 32% for an ISS of 25 (triplets 0, 0, 5 and 0, 3, 4). Two other values (9 and 17) have triplet pairs whose mortality differences are less but still statistically different. The ISS is markedly nonmonotonic and is characterized by large spikes in mortality for successive ISS values. Plots of the ICISS show it to be largely monotonic.
The ISS is a nonmonotonic, triplet-dependent function of mortality. Those who persist in using the ISS to describe populations or make risk adjustments should do so cautiously, being sure to account for triplet type. These suspect ISS values appear in approximately 25% of cases.
损伤严重度评分(ISS)被广泛用于解剖学严重程度评估。ISS是患者三个最严重的简明损伤定级标准(AIS)严重度(1 - 6级)的平方和,这三个严重度来自三个特定身体区域。这组三个AIS严重度(包括0)被称为一个“三联组”。ISS值为9、17、18、25、26、27、29、33、34、41和50可能源自两个独特的三联组,但尚不清楚这些三联组的死亡率是否相等。一个相关问题涉及ISS的单调性,即死亡率是否随ISS的连续值增加。本研究旨在比较不同三联组中相等ISS值的死亡率,并评估ISS是否是死亡率的单调函数。
为361381名国家创伤数据库患者计算了ISS、其对应的三位三联组以及基于国际疾病分类第九版的竞争评分(ICISS)。采用Fisher精确检验来检验产生相同ISS的三联组之间死亡率的差异。绘制按评分值的死亡率图,以直观评估ICISS和ISS的单调性。
11对三联组中有6对的死亡率差异大于20%,最大差异为ISS值为25时的32%(三联组0、0、5和0、3、4)。另外两个值(9和17)的三联组对死亡率差异较小,但仍有统计学差异。ISS明显是非单调的,其特征是连续ISS值的死亡率有大幅波动。ICISS的图显示其在很大程度上是单调的。
ISS是死亡率的非单调、依赖三联组的函数。那些坚持使用ISS来描述人群或进行风险调整的人应谨慎行事,务必考虑三联组类型。这些可疑的ISS值约出现在25%的病例中。