Suppr超能文献

相同的简明损伤定级量表分值可能与创伤患者的死亡率风险相关:一项基于一级创伤中心创伤登记系统的横断面回顾性研究。

Same Abbreviated Injury Scale Values May Be Associated with Different Risks to Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Based on the Trauma Registry System in a Level I Trauma Center.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 88301, Taiwan.

Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 88301, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;14(12):1552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121552.

Abstract

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) measures injury severity of a trauma patient with a numeric method for ranking anatomy-based specific injuries. The summation of the squares of the three most severe injuries in the AIS of six predefined body regions comprises the Injury Severity Score (ISS). It assumes that the mortality of a given AIS value is similar across all body regions. However, such an assumption is less explored in the literature. In this study, we aimed to compare the mortality rates of the patients with the same AIS value in different injured body regions in a level I trauma center. Hospitalized adult trauma patients with isolated serious to critical injury (AIS of 3 to 5) between 1 January 2009, and 31 December 2016, from the Trauma Registry System in a level I trauma center were grouped according to the injured body regions (including, the head/neck, thorax, abdomen, or extremities) and were exclusively compared according to their AIS stratum. Categorical data were compared using the two-sided Fisher exact or Pearson chi-square tests. ANOVA with Games-Howell post hoc test was performed to assess the differences in continuous data of the patients with injury in different body regions. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were estimated using a stepwise selection of a multivariable regression model adjusted by controlling the confounding variables such as sex, age, comorbidities, and ISS. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier approach with a corresponding log-rank test. The patients with AIS of 5 for abdomen injury and those with AIS of 3 for extremity injury had a significantly lower odds of adjusted mortality (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.39, = 0.004 and AOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.15-0.51, < 0.001, respectively) than that of the patients with head/neck injury. However, the patients with AIS of 4 for extremity injury demonstrated significantly higher odds of adjusted mortality (AOR 8.4, 95% CI 2.84-25.07, < 0.001) than the patients with head/neck injury. This study found that the risks to mortality in the patients with a given AIS value of serious to critical injury in different injured body regions were not the same, even after controlling for confounding variables such as sex, age, comorbidities, and ISS.

摘要

损伤严重度评分(AIS)采用数字方法对创伤患者的损伤严重度进行分级,对 6 个预设身体区域中最严重的 3 种损伤进行平方和计算,得出损伤严重度评分(ISS)。它假设在所有身体区域中,给定 AIS 值的死亡率相似。然而,这种假设在文献中探讨得较少。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较同一 AIS 值的患者在一级创伤中心不同受伤身体区域的死亡率。根据受伤身体区域(包括头/颈部、胸部、腹部或四肢),将 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间,一级创伤中心创伤登记系统中严重至危急损伤(AIS 3-5)的成年住院创伤患者进行分组,并根据 AIS 分层进行专门比较。使用双侧 Fisher 确切检验或 Pearson 卡方检验比较分类数据。采用方差分析(ANOVA)与 Games-Howell 事后检验比较不同身体区域受伤患者的连续数据差异。研究的主要结局是院内死亡率。使用逐步选择多变量回归模型,通过控制性别、年龄、合并症和 ISS 等混杂变量,估计调整后的优势比(AOR)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计生存曲线,并进行相应的对数秩检验。腹部 AIS 为 5 的患者和四肢 AIS 为 3 的患者的调整死亡率明显较低(调整后的优势比(AOR)分别为 0.1,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.01-0.39, = 0.004 和 AOR 为 0.3,95%CI 为 0.15-0.51, < 0.001),低于头/颈部损伤患者。然而,四肢 AIS 为 4 的患者的调整死亡率明显较高(AOR 为 8.4,95%CI 为 2.84-25.07, < 0.001),高于头/颈部损伤患者。本研究发现,在不同受伤身体区域中,具有严重至危急损伤的患者在给定 AIS 值下的死亡风险并不相同,即使在控制性别、年龄、合并症和 ISS 等混杂因素后也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1598/5750970/f3a7d7b031cc/ijerph-14-01552-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验