Medvegy Mihály, Savard Pierre, Pintér Arnold, Tremblay Gaétan, Nasmith James B, Palisaitis Donald, Duray Gábor, Préda István, Nadeau Réginald A
Research Centre, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Quebec.
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Sep;20(11):1109-15.
Body surface potential mapping has been shown to be a useful tool in the diagnosis and localization of remote non-Q wave and Q wave myocardial infarction, but human expertise is required to interpret the maps.
To identify quantitative body surface potential mapping parameters that could enable a computer-based diagnosis.
Body surface isopotential maps (63 unipolar leads) were recorded in 86 patients with remote Q wave and 71 patients with remote non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Twenty-four healthy adults served as control subjects. Myocardial infarctions were classified using standard electrocardiogram leads in the acute and chronic phases, and were validated by coronary angiography, ventriculography and thallium scintigraphy.
Two simple quantitative parameters with high diagnostic power were identified: the time interval between the peak minimum and the peak maximum potentials (time-shift), and the ratio of these potentials (maximum to minimum ratio [max/min]). Both parameters showed significant differences between infarction patients and normal control subjects, and optimum cut-off values were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (anterior infarction: time-shift of -4 ms or less, max/min of 0.6 or less; posterior infarction: time-shift of 8 ms or greater, max/min of 1.25 or greater). The sensitivities of the two parameters were 100% and 97%, and the specificities were 99% and 100%, respectively, in the anterior Q wave infarction group, compared with sensitivities of 88% and 100%, and specificities of 94% and 95%, respectively, in the posterior Q wave infarction group. In the anterior non-Q wave infarction group, sensitivity was 35% for both parameters, specificity was 100% for both parameters, and only infarctions associated with a low ejection fraction were detected, indicating that infarction size may influence the power of the tests.
Time-shift and max/min are two new, simple, powerful parameters for infarction diagnosis and may also be suitable for automated, computer-based processing.
体表电位标测已被证明是诊断和定位陈旧性非Q波和Q波心肌梗死的有用工具,但解读这些图谱需要专业知识。
确定能够实现基于计算机诊断的体表电位标测定量参数。
记录了86例陈旧性Q波心肌梗死患者和71例陈旧性非Q波心肌梗死患者的体表等电位图(63个单极导联)。24名健康成年人作为对照。在急性期和慢性期使用标准心电图导联对心肌梗死进行分类,并通过冠状动脉造影、心室造影和铊闪烁显像进行验证。
确定了两个具有高诊断效能的简单定量参数:最小峰值电位与最大峰值电位之间的时间间隔(时间偏移)以及这些电位的比值(最大与最小比值[max/min])。这两个参数在梗死患者和正常对照之间均显示出显著差异,并使用受试者工作特征曲线确定了最佳截断值(前壁梗死:时间偏移为-4 ms或更小,max/min为0.6或更小;后壁梗死:时间偏移为8 ms或更大,max/min为1.25或更大)。在前壁Q波梗死组中,这两个参数的敏感性分别为100%和97%,特异性分别为99%和100%,而后壁Q波梗死组的敏感性分别为88%和100%,特异性分别为94%和95%。在前壁非Q波梗死组中,两个参数的敏感性均为35%,特异性均为100%,且仅检测到与低射血分数相关的梗死,表明梗死大小可能影响检测效能。
时间偏移和max/min是用于梗死诊断的两个新的、简单且有效的参数,也可能适用于基于计算机的自动化处理。