Mohan Jagdish C, Mukherjee Samanjoy, Kumar Ashish, Arora Ramesh, Patel Ayan R, Pandian Natesa G
Division of Cardiology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Am Heart J. 2004 Oct;148(4):703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.043.
In patients with mitral stenosis (MS), Doppler pressure half-time (PHT) may be influenced by hemodynamic variables other than the anatomic mitral valve orifice narrowing. This study was undertaken to assess whether the presence of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) affects mitral valve area (MVA) estimation by PHT.
Consecutive patients (n = 166) with noncalcific MS, in sinus rhythm, were studied. Group 1 (n = 106) had no or mild MR, and group 2 (n = 60) had moderate or severe MR. MVA was assessed by using the PHT method and planimetry.
There was a strong correlation between planimetry and PHT MVA in both groups (group 1: r = 0.86, P <.001; group 2: r = 0.73, P <.001). However, compared with planimetry MVA, PHT underestimated MVA by > or =20% in 18 patients (17%) in group 1 and 21 patients (35%) in group 2 (P <.01). Overestimation by > or =20% occurred in 12 patients (11%) in group 1 and in 7 (12%) in group 2. Group 2 subanalysis (group 2A: moderate MR, n = 16; group 2B: severe MR, n = 44) revealed that linear regression weakened with increasing severity of MR (group 2A: r = 0.824, P <.001, group 2B: r = 0.70, P <.001). PHT underestimation of MVA occurred in 31% and 36% of patients in Groups IIA and IIB, respectively (P = NS).
PHT appears to be reliable for estimating MVA in most patients with MS, even in the presence of MR. However, the presence of significant MR reduces the reliability of PHT-derived MVA, with underestimation of MVA in a significant number of subjects. The severity of MR has a direct impact on PHT-derived MVA.
在二尖瓣狭窄(MS)患者中,多普勒压力减半时间(PHT)可能受解剖学二尖瓣口狭窄以外的血流动力学变量影响。本研究旨在评估合并二尖瓣反流(MR)是否会影响通过PHT评估二尖瓣面积(MVA)。
对连续的166例非钙化性MS且为窦性心律的患者进行研究。第1组(n = 106)无或有轻度MR,第2组(n = 60)有中度或重度MR。通过PHT法和平面测量法评估MVA。
两组中平面测量法与PHT法测得的MVA之间均存在强相关性(第1组:r = 0.86,P <.001;第2组:r = 0.73,P <.001)。然而,与平面测量法测得的MVA相比,PHT法在第1组18例患者(17%)和第2组21例患者(35%)中低估MVA≥20%(P <.01)。第1组12例患者(11%)和第2组7例患者(12%)中出现高估≥20%。第2组亚分析(2A组:中度MR,n = 16;2B组:重度MR,n = 44)显示,随着MR严重程度增加,线性回归减弱(2A组:r = 0.824,P <.001;2B组:r = 0.70,P <.001)。2A组和2B组分别有31%和36%的患者出现PHT法低估MVA(P = 无显著性差异)。
PHT法在大多数MS患者中似乎可可靠地评估MVA,即使存在MR时也是如此。然而,显著MR的存在会降低PHT法评估MVA的可靠性,导致相当数量的受试者MVA被低估。MR的严重程度对PHT法评估的MVA有直接影响。