• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白内障手术后的个体术后屈光——光学与声学生物测量法的比较

[Individual postoperative refraction after cataract surgery -- a comparison of optical and acoustical biometry].

作者信息

Kutschan A, Wiegand W

机构信息

Abteilung für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum Nord/Heidberg, Hamburg.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Sep;221(9):743-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813385.

DOI:10.1055/s-2004-813385
PMID:15459840
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optical biometry with the IOL-Master is an innovative technique that claims to improve the refractive results of cataract surgery compared to acoustical biometry.

METHODS

In 140 consecutive non-selected eyes prior to cataract surgery firstly an optical biometry (IOL-Master, Zeiss, V.2.02) and secondly an ultrasound biometry (Sonomed) were carried out. Cataract surgery was performed using either a PMMA-IOL (n = 56) or an acrylic IOL (n = 84). The PMMA-IOL's were implanted in the capsular bag via a scleral tunnel. The acrylic-IOL's were implanted via a clear cornea incision in the capsular bag. The length of the globe was analysed and the deviations between the postoperative refraction after 3 month and the preoperative planned refraction were compared.

RESULTS

The mean axial length difference between optical biometry and acoustical biometry was 0.19 mm in the PMMA-lens group and 0.16 mm in the acrylic-lens group. The deviation of postoperative refraction (spherical mean) from the planned refraction was 0.46 +/- 0.88 D in the PMMA-IOL group and 0.25 +/- 0.77 D in the acrylic IOL group when biometry was performed by ultrasonography. When optical biometry was performed the respective values were 1.15 +/- 0.83 D in the PMMA-IOL group and 0.84 +/- 0.75 D in the acrylic IOL group. The differences in mean postoperative refraction of optical and acoustical biometry can be compensated by adaptation of the A constants. The standard deviation of the difference between the postoperative refraction and the preoperatively planned refraction - that means the individual deviations between postoperative refraction and preoperatively planned refraction - were almost identical in optical and acoustical biometry.

CONCLUSION

Optical biometry represents a significant simplification in the course of investigation prior to cataract surgery. The claim of optical biometry, however, to gain a higher precision and thus a significantly better prediction of individual postoperative refraction after cataract surgery is not yet fulfilled.

摘要

背景

使用IOL-Master进行光学生物测量是一项创新技术,据称与声学生物测量相比,它能改善白内障手术的屈光效果。

方法

在140例连续的、未经过挑选的白内障手术前的眼睛中,首先进行光学生物测量(IOL-Master,蔡司,V.2.02),其次进行超声生物测量(Sonomed)。白内障手术使用PMMA人工晶状体(n = 56)或丙烯酸人工晶状体(n = 84)进行。PMMA人工晶状体通过巩膜隧道植入囊袋内。丙烯酸人工晶状体通过透明角膜切口植入囊袋内。分析眼轴长度,并比较术后3个月的屈光与术前计划屈光之间的偏差。

结果

在PMMA晶状体组中,光学生物测量与声学生物测量之间的平均眼轴长度差异为0.19mm,在丙烯酸晶状体组中为0.16mm。当通过超声检查进行生物测量时,PMMA人工晶状体组术后屈光(球镜平均值)与计划屈光的偏差为0.46±0.88D,丙烯酸人工晶状体组为0.25±0.77D。当进行光学生物测量时,PMMA人工晶状体组的相应值为1.15±0.83D,丙烯酸人工晶状体组为0.84±0.75D。光学和声学生物测量术后平均屈光的差异可通过调整A常数来补偿。术后屈光与术前计划屈光之间差异的标准差——即术后屈光与术前计划屈光之间的个体偏差——在光学和声学生物测量中几乎相同。

结论

光学生物测量在白内障手术前的检查过程中代表了一种显著的简化。然而,光学生物测量所宣称的获得更高精度并因此显著更好地预测白内障手术后个体术后屈光的目标尚未实现。

相似文献

1
[Individual postoperative refraction after cataract surgery -- a comparison of optical and acoustical biometry].白内障手术后的个体术后屈光——光学与声学生物测量法的比较
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Sep;221(9):743-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813385.
2
[Comparison of the optical coherence method (Zeiss IOL-Master) with two ultrasonographic biometric methods for the calculation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses after phacoemulsification as part of clinical routine].[作为临床常规操作的一部分,比较光学相干法(蔡司IOL-Master)与两种超声生物测量法在白内障超声乳化术后计算后房型人工晶状体中的应用]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Oct;221(10):837-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813658.
3
[Pitfalls of IOL power prediction after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia -- case report, practical recommendations and literature review].[高度近视准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后人工晶状体度数预测的陷阱——病例报告、实用建议及文献综述]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2002 Dec;219(12):840-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-36943.
4
["Refractive" cataract surgery. PMMA IOLs versus foldable IOLs].["屈光性”白内障手术。聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯人工晶状体与可折叠人工晶状体对比]
Ophthalmologe. 2003 Apr;100(4):318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00347-002-0695-9.
5
Intraoperative optical refractive biometry for intraocular lens power estimation without axial length and keratometry measurements.用于在不进行眼轴长度和角膜曲率测量的情况下估计人工晶状体屈光力的术中光学屈光生物测量法。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Aug;31(8):1530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.01.035.
6
[First steps with the Zeiss IOLMaster: A comparison between acoustic contact biometry and non-contact optical biometry].
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2003 May;220(5):309-14. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39430.
7
[Evaluation of the residual refractive error of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses].[疏水性丙烯酸人工晶状体残余屈光不正的评估]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007 Jan;224(1):18-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927211.
8
Effect of cataract surgery incision location and intraocular lens type on ocular aberrations.白内障手术切口位置和人工晶状体类型对眼像差的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Apr;31(4):725-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.028.
9
Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL master. A prospective study.使用蔡司IOL Master进行人工晶状体屈光力计算的准确性。一项前瞻性研究。
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2001(281):61-5.
10
[Quality assurance in biometry before cataract surgery: which patients have an increased risk of aberrance from target refraction?].[白内障手术前生物测量中的质量保证:哪些患者出现目标屈光偏差的风险增加?]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007 Apr;224(4):244-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-962961.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the refractive outcome and accuracy of IOL power calculation after phacoemulsification using the SRK/T formula with ultrasound biometry in medium axial lengths.使用SRK/T公式结合超声生物测量法预测中度眼轴长度患者白内障超声乳化术后的屈光结果及人工晶状体屈光力计算的准确性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 15;11:1143-1149. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S136882. eCollection 2017.