van Brakel Thomas J, Bolotin Gil, Salleng Kenneth J, Nifong L Wiley, Allessie Maurits A, Chitwood W Randolph, Maessen Jos G
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Oct;78(4):1397-402; discussion 1397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.030.
Pulmonary vein isolation is a hallmark in current surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. However, validation of isolation remains cumbersome. We evaluated electrophysiologic and not histologic means to test isolation.
In 16 mongrel dogs, robot-assisted epicardial beating-heart microwave ablation (FLEX 10) was performed around the pulmonary veins. Electrophysiologic isolation was tested by pacing at 4 times threshold values inside and outside the pulmonary veins (exit and entrance block). The histology of lesions was studied for transmurality and continuity of the lesion lines. In 5 dogs, lesions were studied at various time intervals.
Histologic evaluation of the lesions showed incomplete (48% +/- 20%) circumferential myocardial damage in all dogs with acute lesions. Electrophysiologic evaluation showed completion of the box (entrance and exit block) in 8 dogs and in another 5 dogs after repeated ablation (p < 0.01 compared with histologic evaluation). Electrophysiologic evaluation of the dogs with chronic lesions showed completed lesions in 4 of 5 dogs directly after ablation. At follow-up (1 to 3 weeks), the isolations remained electrophysiologically complete. Histologic evaluation of the lesions 1 to 3 weeks after ablation showed complete (100%) circumferential lesions in all 4 dogs (p < 0.001 compared with the histology of dogs with acute lesions).
Directly after treatment, ablation lesions are best evaluated electrophysiologically, because complete (transmural and circumferential) lesions are not shown by histologic evaluation in the acute stage. After 1 to 3 weeks, the histology is in accordance with the electrophysiology. To obtain a complete isolation, online electrophysiologic evaluation during pulmonary vein microwave ablation is necessary to optimize the results.
肺静脉隔离是当前房颤外科消融的一项标志性操作。然而,隔离的验证仍然很繁琐。我们评估了通过电生理而非组织学方法来检测隔离情况。
对16只杂种犬在肺静脉周围进行机器人辅助的心外膜跳动心脏微波消融(FLEX 10)。通过在肺静脉内外4倍阈值进行起搏来测试电生理隔离(出口和入口阻滞)。研究病变的组织学情况,观察病变线的透壁性和连续性。对5只犬在不同时间间隔研究病变情况。
对急性病变犬的病变进行组织学评估显示,所有犬均有不完全(48%±20%)的圆周心肌损伤。电生理评估显示,8只犬以及另外5只犬在重复消融后完成了“框”形(入口和出口阻滞)(与组织学评估相比,p<0.01)。对慢性病变犬的电生理评估显示,5只犬中有4只在消融后直接完成了病变。在随访(1至3周)时,隔离在电生理上仍保持完整。消融后1至3周对病变进行组织学评估显示,所有4只犬均有完全(100%)的圆周病变(与急性病变犬的组织学相比,p<0.001)。
治疗后直接进行评估时,最好通过电生理方法评估消融病变,因为急性期组织学评估未显示完全(透壁和圆周)病变。1至3周后,组织学与电生理情况相符。为实现完全隔离,肺静脉微波消融期间进行在线电生理评估对于优化结果是必要的。