Singh Harsimran S, Yue Ning, Azimi Nassir, Nath Ravinder, Roberts Kenneth B, Pfau Steven
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine and West Haven VA Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Oct 1;94(7):847-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.016.
Intravascular brachytherapy is the primary treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis. Variations in dose in the treated artery may represent a potential cause of treatment failure. We compared dose distributions in patients who had developed recurrent restenosis (treatment failure) with those in patients who remained event free at 9 months (treatment success). We followed 140 patients who were receiving brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis with 4 radiation delivery devices to identify treatment failures and successes. Through a nested case-control construct, treatment failures (n = 14) were compared 1:2 with treatment successes (n = 28) matched by radiation delivery system and in-stent restenosis lesion pattern. The dose absorbed by 90% of the artery encompassed by the external elastic membrane (D(90)EEM) was calculated by applying intravascular ultrasound at 2-mm intervals along the treated lesion. Dose calculations were performed using dose kernel integration techniques generated from Monte Carlo simulations. The mean minimum D(90)EEM in treatment failures was 7.46 +/- 1.98 Gy, and that in treatment successes was 8.87 +/- 1.13 Gy (p = 0.007). Using a minimum dose threshold of 8.4 Gy, a minimum D(90)EEM <or=8.4 Gy occurred in 13 patients (93%) whose treatment failed but only in 9 patients (32%) whose treatment was a success (p <or=0.001). No confounding variables were found to be statistically significant between treatment failures and successes. In conclusion, current brachytherapy dose prescriptions allow for inter- and intralesion variations in dose. Arteries that receive <or=8.4 Gy at any point along the external elastic membrane are more likely to result in treatment failures. Dosimetry guided by intravascular ultrasound may be critical to ensure adequate dose delivery and outcomes.
血管内近距离放射疗法是冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的主要治疗方法。治疗动脉内剂量的变化可能是治疗失败的潜在原因。我们比较了出现复发性再狭窄(治疗失败)的患者与9个月时无事件发生(治疗成功)的患者的剂量分布。我们对140例接受支架内再狭窄近距离放射治疗的患者使用4种放射输送装置进行随访,以确定治疗失败和成功的情况。通过嵌套病例对照结构,将治疗失败组(n = 14)与治疗成功组(n = 28)按1:2进行比较,两组在放射输送系统和支架内再狭窄病变模式方面相匹配。通过沿治疗病变以2毫米间隔应用血管内超声来计算由外弹力膜包围的90%动脉所吸收的剂量(D(90)EEM)。剂量计算使用由蒙特卡罗模拟生成的剂量核积分技术。治疗失败组的平均最小D(90)EEM为7.46±1.98 Gy,治疗成功组为8.87±1.13 Gy(p = 0.007)。使用8.4 Gy的最小剂量阈值,治疗失败的13例患者(93%)出现最小D(90)EEM≤8.4 Gy,而治疗成功的患者中只有9例(32%)出现这种情况(p≤0.001)。在治疗失败组和成功组之间未发现有统计学意义的混杂变量。总之,目前的近距离放射治疗剂量处方允许剂量在病变间和病变内存在变化。沿外弹力膜任何点接受≤8.4 Gy剂量的动脉更有可能导致治疗失败。血管内超声引导的剂量测定对于确保足够的剂量输送和治疗结果可能至关重要。