Suppr超能文献

子宫颈鳞状细胞癌和腺癌中环氧合酶-2的差异表达。

Differential cyclooxygenase-2 expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

作者信息

Kim Yong Bae, Kim Gwi Eon, Pyo Hong Ryull, Cho Nam Hoon, Keum Ki Chang, Lee Chang Geol, Seong Jinsil, Suh Chang Ok, Park Tchan Kyu

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemoon-Gu, Shuinchon-Dong 134, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 1;60(3):822-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.030.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the differential expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the uterine cervix and the prognostic significance of COX-2 expression in these histologic types.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 105 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB uterine cervical cancer patients were screened for COX-2 expression immunohistochemically. COX-2 expression was determined in invasive cervical SCC (n = 84) and invasive cervical ADC (n = 21). To determine the clinical significance of COX-2 expression by histologic type, the patients were arbitrarily divided into four groups: SCC/COX-2 negative (n = 64); SCC/COX-2 positive (n = 20); ADC/COX-2 negative (n = 9); and ADC/COX-2 positive (n = 12). The clinical response to treatment, patterns of treatment failure, and survival data by COX-2 expression were compared for these two major histologic types. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical examination showed that COX-2 expression was more frequently observed in ADC than in SCC (57% vs. 24%, p = 0.007). Moreover, COX-2 expression was an important predictor of treatment response, irrespective of the histologic type. All COX-2-negative patients achieved complete remission after initial treatment; 17% of SCC patients and 33% of ADC patients with COX-2 expression did not have complete remission after the initial treatment. The incidence of local failure for those with COX-2 expression was significantly greater than for COX-2-negative patients, regardless of histologic type. With a minimal follow-up of 60 months, the overall 5-year actuarial survival rate for SCC and ADC patients was 79% and 62%, respectively (p = 0.05). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for SCC and ADC patients was 73% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.13). Irrespective of the pathologic type, COX-2-positive patients had an unfavorable prognosis. The overall 5-year actuarial survival rate was 57% for COX-2-positive patients and 83% for COX-2-negative patients (p = 0.001). When patients were stratified into the four groups according to histologic type and COX-2 expression status, ADC/COX-2-positive patients had the worst prognosis, with an overall 5-year actuarial survival rate of 49% compared with 78% for ADC/COX-2-negative patients, 62% for SCC/COX-2-positive, and 84% for SCC/COX-2-negative patients (p = 0.007, log-rank test). Irrespective of histologic type, COX-2 expression was an independent prognostic factor by univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

In uterine cervical cancer, COX-2 was expressed in a greater proportion of ADC patients than SCC patients. COX-2 expression was also identified as a major determiner of a poor response to treatment and of an unfavorable prognosis, irrespective of the histologic type, reflecting the importance of the COX-2 protein in the acquisition of biologic aggressiveness and more malignant phenotype or increased resistance to the standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy in both histologic types. Given these observations, we believe that that ADC/COX-2-positive patients might be appropriate candidates for future trials of selective COX-2 inhibitor adjunctive therapy.

摘要

目的

确定环氧化酶-2(COX-2)在子宫颈鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和腺癌(ADC)患者中的差异表达,以及COX-2表达在这些组织学类型中的预后意义。

方法和材料

对105例国际妇产科联盟IIB期子宫颈癌患者进行免疫组织化学检测,以筛选COX-2表达情况。在浸润性子宫颈SCC(n = 84)和浸润性子宫颈ADC(n = 21)中测定COX-2表达。为了确定按组织学类型划分的COX-2表达的临床意义,将患者任意分为四组:SCC/COX-2阴性(n = 64);SCC/COX-2阳性(n = 20);ADC/COX-2阴性(n = 9);以及ADC/COX-2阳性(n = 12)。比较这两种主要组织学类型患者的治疗临床反应、治疗失败模式以及按COX-2表达情况的生存数据。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定影响生存的预后因素。

结果

免疫组织化学检查显示,ADC中COX-2表达的观察频率高于SCC(57%对24%,p = 0.007)。此外,无论组织学类型如何,COX-2表达都是治疗反应的重要预测指标。所有COX-2阴性患者在初始治疗后均实现完全缓解;17%的SCC患者和33%的COX-2表达阳性的ADC患者在初始治疗后未实现完全缓解。无论组织学类型如何,COX-2表达阳性患者的局部失败发生率显著高于COX-2阴性患者。在至少随访60个月的情况下 , SCC和ADC患者的总体5年精算生存率分别为79%和62%(p = 0.05)。SCC和ADC患者的5年无病生存率分别为73%和56%(p = 0.13)。无论病理类型如何,COX-2阳性患者的预后均较差。COX-2阳性患者的总体5年精算生存率为57%,COX-2阴性患者为83%(p = 0.001)。当根据组织学类型和COX-2表达状态将患者分层为四组时,ADC/COX-2阳性患者的预后最差,总体5年精算生存率为49%,而ADC/COX-2阴性患者为78%,SCC/COX-2阳性患者为62%,SCC/COX-2阴性患者为84%(p = 0.007,对数秩检验)。无论组织学类型如何,通过单因素和多因素分析,COX-2表达都是独立的预后因素。

结论

在子宫颈癌中,ADC患者中COX-2的表达比例高于SCC患者。无论组织学类型如何,COX-2表达也被确定为治疗反应不佳和预后不良的主要决定因素,这反映了COX-2蛋白在获得生物学侵袭性和更恶性表型或增加对两种组织学类型的标准化化疗和放疗的抗性中的重要性。基于这些观察结果,我们认为ADC/COX-2阳性患者可能是未来选择性COX-2抑制剂辅助治疗试验的合适候选者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验