Suppr超能文献

十二指肠溃疡的维持治疗:七种治疗方式的随机对照比较

Maintenance therapy for duodenal ulcer: a randomized controlled comparison of seven forms of treatment.

作者信息

Hui W M, Lam S K, Lok A S, Ng M M, Lai C L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1992 Mar;92(3):265-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90076-n.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of seven forms of maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer, including a mealtime regimen of antacids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomized 785 patients with healed duodenal ulcer to receive: (1) no treatment; (2) mealtime antacids with an acid-neutralizing capacity of 80 mmol/day; (3) an antidepressant, trimipramine 25 mg; (4) an anticholinergic, pirenzepine 50 mg; (5) cimetidine 200 mg; (6) cimetidine 400 mg; (7) ranitidine 150 mg; or (8) sucralfate 1 g twice a day. Symptomatology and side effects were assessed every 2 months and endoscopy was performed every 4 months up to 1 year.

RESULTS

The patients were comparable in the majority of clinical characteristics before entry. The cumulative percentages of patients with relapse of ulcers at 12 months by life-table analysis were 61% with no treatment, 38% with mealtime antacids, 60% with trimipramine, 52% with pirenzepine, 46% with cimetidine 200 mg, 44% with cimetidine 400 mg, 30% with ranitidine 150 mg, and 40% with sucralfate. Cimetidine 400 mg, antacids, ranitidine 150 mg, and sucralfate were significantly better than no treatment and the other forms of treatment. Ranitidine was significantly better than antacids, cimetidine, and sucralfate in preventing endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer relapse by multiple comparison at 12 months, but not by life-table analysis nor when symptomatic relapses were compared. No significant difference was detected among antacids, cimetidine, and sucralfate. No major side effects occurred with the seven forms of treatment, but those receiving antacids had the highest incidence of minor adverse events (26%).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that mealtime antacids are as effective as H2-receptor antagonists and sucralfate in the maintenance treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, but have to be taken three times a day and had the highest incidence of reported minor adverse events. The relapse rate was lower with ranitidine than with cimetidine, sucralfate, and antacids, but the difference was small and may not be clinically important.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以比较十二指肠溃疡七种维持治疗方式的疗效,包括餐时服用抗酸剂的疗法。

患者与方法

我们将785例十二指肠溃疡已愈合的患者随机分组,接受以下治疗:(1)不治疗;(2)餐时服用中和胃酸能力为80 mmol/天的抗酸剂;(3)一种抗抑郁药,三甲丙咪嗪25 mg;(4)一种抗胆碱能药,哌仑西平50 mg;(5)西咪替丁200 mg;(6)西咪替丁400 mg;(7)雷尼替丁150 mg;或(8)硫糖铝1 g,每日两次。每2个月评估症状和副作用,每4个月进行一次内镜检查,持续1年。

结果

入组前患者的大多数临床特征具有可比性。通过寿命表分析,12个月时溃疡复发患者的累积百分比分别为:不治疗组61%,餐时服用抗酸剂组38%,三甲丙咪嗪组60%,哌仑西平组52%,西咪替丁200 mg组46%,西咪替丁400 mg组44%,雷尼替丁150 mg组30%,硫糖铝组40%。西咪替丁400 mg、抗酸剂、雷尼替丁150 mg和硫糖铝在预防溃疡复发方面显著优于不治疗组及其他治疗方式。通过12个月时的多重比较,雷尼替丁在预防内镜证实的十二指肠溃疡复发方面显著优于抗酸剂、西咪替丁和硫糖铝,但在寿命表分析中以及比较症状性复发时并非如此。抗酸剂、西咪替丁和硫糖铝之间未检测到显著差异。七种治疗方式均未出现严重副作用,但服用抗酸剂的患者轻微不良事件发生率最高(26%)。

结论

本研究表明,餐时服用抗酸剂在十二指肠溃疡疾病的维持治疗中与H2受体拮抗剂和硫糖铝效果相当,但需每日服用三次,且报告的轻微不良事件发生率最高。雷尼替丁的复发率低于西咪替丁、硫糖铝和抗酸剂,但差异较小,可能在临床上并不重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验