Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.
作者信息
Emanuel E J
机构信息
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
出版信息
Am J Med. 1992 Mar;92(3):307-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90081-l.
PMID:1546730
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.保障患者拒绝医疗护理的权利：赞克鲁赞案判决
Am J Med. 1992 Mar;92(3):307-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90081-l.
2
The legal consensus about foregoing life-sustaining treatment: its status and its prospects.关于放弃维持生命治疗的法律共识：其现状与前景。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1992 Dec;2(4):309-45. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0124.
3
Essays in the aftermath of Cruzan.克鲁赞案之后的文章。
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):563-71. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.563.
4
Nancy Cruzan in China.南希·克鲁赞在中国。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Sep-Oct;20(5):39-41.
5
From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.从昆兰案到克鲁赞案：美国“死亡权利”判例法的格局
Humane Med. 1992 Apr;8(2):122-31.
6
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案
Wests Supreme Court Report. 1990 Jun 25;110:2841-92.
7
8
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案。小题大做。
J Leg Med. 1991 Sep;12(3):331-58. doi: 10.1080/01947649109510859.
9
The right to death.死亡的权利。
New York Rev Books. 1991 Jan 31:14-7.
10
Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.克鲁赞案及其对患者自我决定权的影响。
J Fam Law. 1991;30(1):111-33.
引用本文的文献
1
Decisions to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Patient Characteristics and Ethical Considerations.决定撤除外置膜肺氧合支持：患者特征和伦理考虑。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):620-627. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.020. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
2
Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support.撤掉全人工心脏支持的伦理分析
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 May;92(5):719-725. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.021.
3
Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support.心室辅助装置支持的撤机伦理分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Sep;85(9):791-7. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0113. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
Zotero 插件