Trevisan P, Gobber G
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, S. Maria del Prato Hospital, Feltre (BL), Italy.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2004 Sep;70(9):631-42.
The majority of Italian hospitals are not equipped with a Post- Anesthetic Care Unit. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether it is possible to guarantee post-anesthetic care according to current international quality and safety standards in the absence of such a structure.
Our hospital is not equipped with a Post-Anesthetic Care Unit and post-anesthetic assistance is assured by the anesthetist and anesthetic nurse themselves. In order to evaluate the quality of the post-anesthetic care a Recovery Chart was devised and strict discharge criteria defined: Recovery Score (modified Aldrete's score) = or >7; systolic blood pressure within 20% of the preoperative values; nausea/vomiting and shivering absent; pain absent/mild. A retrospective audit was conducted in 2 orthopedic operating rooms from January 10, 2000 to January 31, 2001 in order to evaluate major complications, observance of discharge criteria, postanesthetic care time.
Incidence of complications was 2.6%. Observance of discharge criteria was 74%. In 26% of cases (69/261 cases) discharge criteria were not completely respected: 14 cases with unstable vital parameters; 46 cases with pain not under control; 6 cases with nausea/vomiting; 3 cases with shivering. In these cases monitoring and treatment was continued on the ward according to the anesthetist's prescriptions. None of these patients died or suffered major complications because of a quick discharge to the ward. Mean post-anesthetic care time was 40+/-18 minutes (median 35 minutes).
Where the Post- Anaesthetic Care Unit is not available it is virtually impossible to guarantee post-anesthetic care according to current international quality and safety standards, because production pressure can lead the anesthetist to discharge the patient to the ward before he/she is completely stabilized. In these cases the anesthetist must accurately prescribe the necessary postoperative monitoring and treatment (analgesics, antiemetics, fluids, etc.) that must be continued in the surgical ward to guarantee the patient's safety, but it must be underlined that the surgical ward is not the appropriate place to carry on immediate post-anesthetic care.
大多数意大利医院没有配备麻醉后护理单元。本研究的目的是评估在没有这样一个机构的情况下,是否有可能按照当前国际质量和安全标准提供麻醉后护理。
我们医院没有配备麻醉后护理单元,麻醉后护理由麻醉医生和麻醉护士自行提供。为了评估麻醉后护理的质量,设计了一份恢复图表并定义了严格的出院标准:恢复评分(改良的Aldrete评分)=或>7;收缩压在术前值的20%以内;无恶心/呕吐和寒战;无疼痛/轻度疼痛。为了评估主要并发症、出院标准的遵守情况、麻醉后护理时间,于2000年1月10日至2001年1月31日在2个骨科手术室进行了一项回顾性审计。
并发症发生率为2.6%。出院标准的遵守率为74%。在26%的病例(261例中的69例)中,出院标准未得到完全遵守:14例生命体征不稳定;46例疼痛未得到控制;6例恶心/呕吐;3例寒战。在这些病例中,根据麻醉医生的处方在病房继续进行监测和治疗。这些患者中没有一人因过早出院到病房而死亡或发生重大并发症。麻醉后护理的平均时间为40±18分钟(中位数35分钟)。
在没有麻醉后护理单元的情况下,几乎不可能按照当前国际质量和安全标准提供麻醉后护理,因为生产压力可能导致麻醉医生在患者完全稳定之前就将其送回病房。在这些情况下,麻醉医生必须准确地开出必要的术后监测和治疗(镇痛药、止吐药、液体等)处方,这些治疗必须在外科病房继续进行以确保患者安全,但必须强调的是,外科病房不是进行即时麻醉后护理的合适场所。