• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭医学科的排名:旁观者的看法?

Ranking departments of family medicine: the eye of the beholder?

作者信息

Carek Peter J, Hueston William J

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29406, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2004 Oct;36(9):660-3.

PMID:15467944
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

During each of the past several years, a nationally circulated periodical (US News & World Report) has provided a ranking of medical schools and their respective specialty departments. In contrast to the method used to rank medical schools, medical specialties, including family medicine, are ranked based solely on ratings by deans and senior faculty at peer schools. This study's purpose was to explore how closely this expert opinion-based process matches actual objective and quantifiable data about departmental performance.

METHODS

Available quantifiable data in the following categories were obtained: administration, academic productivity, and medical student and resident education. Based on their ranking in a category, each department was awarded one to five stars depending on the quintile they achieved (except for the dichotomous variable pertaining to the presence of a postresidency fellowship). Five stars indicate a ranking in the highest quintile.

RESULTS

In regards to success in administration, research, and residency education and production of family physicians, the departments, on average, were rated 3.4, 4.2, and 3.6 stars, respectively. Overall, half of the departments consistently ranked in the top quartile, as indicated by an average score of 4.0 to 5.0 stars.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the departments rated highly in the US News & World Report rankings of the departments of family medicine rated very high in the areas of administration, research, and education as determined by quantifiable information. In contrast, several highly ranked departments were not rated favorably in areas usually associated with excellence in academics.

摘要

背景与目的

在过去几年中,一份全国发行的期刊(《美国新闻与世界报道》)对医学院及其各个专业科室进行了排名。与医学院的排名方法不同,包括家庭医学在内的医学专业排名仅基于同行院校院长和资深教员的评分。本研究的目的是探讨这种基于专家意见的过程与有关科室表现的实际客观可量化数据的匹配程度。

方法

获取了以下几类可用的可量化数据:管理、学术产出以及医学生和住院医师教育。根据各科室在某一类别中的排名,根据其所处的五分位数,每个科室被授予一到五星(除了与住院后奖学金是否存在相关的二分变量)。五星表示排名在最高五分位数。

结果

在管理、研究、住院医师教育以及家庭医生培养方面的成功程度上,各科室平均分别被评为3.4星、4.2星和3.6星。总体而言,一半的科室始终排名在前四分位,平均得分为4.0至5.0星。

结论

在《美国新闻与世界报道》的家庭医学科室排名中获得高分的许多科室,根据可量化信息,在管理、研究和教育领域的评分也非常高。相比之下,几个排名靠前的科室在通常与学术卓越相关的领域中评分并不高。

相似文献

1
Ranking departments of family medicine: the eye of the beholder?家庭医学科的排名:旁观者的看法?
Fam Med. 2004 Oct;36(9):660-3.
2
Female and underrepresented minority faculty in academic departments of family medicine: are women and minorities better off in family medicine?家庭医学学术部门中的女性和代表性不足的少数族裔教员:女性和少数族裔在家庭医学领域的处境会更好吗?
Fam Med. 2001 Jun;33(6):459-65.
3
Clinical practice in academic medical center departments of family medicine. The Association of Departments of Family Medicine Task Force on Clinical Practice in US family medicine departments in academic medical centers.学术医疗中心家庭医学科的临床实践。学术医疗中心美国家庭医学科临床实践特别工作组。
Fam Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):15-20.
4
The financial status of departments of family medicine at US medical schools.美国医学院家庭医学系的财务状况。
Fam Med. 2001 Mar;33(3):166-70.
5
Faculty perceptions of the ACGME resident duty hour regulations in family medicine.教职员工对美国研究生医学教育认证委员会家庭医学住院医师值班时间规定的看法。
Fam Med. 2007 Jun;39(6):392-8.
6
Publication productivity in academic family medicine departments.学术性家庭医学科的论文发表产出情况。
Fam Med. 1994 Jun;26(6):366-9.
7
Challenges to academic family medicine in the current health care environment.当前医疗环境下学术性家庭医学面临的挑战。
Fam Med. 2000 Apr;32(4):240-5.
8
Survey of curriculum on homosexuality/bisexuality in departments of family medicine.家庭医学系同性恋/双性恋课程调查
Fam Med. 1998 Apr;30(4):283-7.
9
Promotion and tenure in family practice in US medical schools.美国医学院家庭医学专业的晋升与终身教职
J Fam Pract. 1984 Mar;18(3):435-9.
10
Effectiveness of medical school admissions criteria in predicting residency ranking four years later.医学院录取标准对四年后住院医师排名预测的有效性。
Med Educ. 2007 Jan;41(1):57-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02647.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of medical training and emigration of physicians from India.印度的医学培训质量与医生移民
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 30;8:279. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-279.