Tugwell Peter S, Wells George A, Shainhouse J Zev
Centre for Global Health, Institute of Population Health, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;31(10):2002-12.
. To compare the safety and efficacy of a topical diclofenac solution versus oral diclofenac in relieving the symptoms of primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy equivalence trial.
A total of 622 men and women with radiological evidence of primary knee OA and mild to severe symptoms were randomly assigned to treatment with a topical diclofenac solution plus placebo oral capsules, or placebo topical solution plus oral diclofenac (50 mg) capsules. Patients applied 50 drops of study solution and took 1 study capsule 3 times daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables were pain and physical function, measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) VA 3.1 OA Index, and patient global assessment (PGA). Equivalence in the per-protocol group was based on previously defined ranges of clinically significant difference. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory data.
The difference in mean (95% CI) change scores (final minus baseline) between treatments was 13.3 mm (-8.6 to 35.2) for pain (total scale 500 mm), 71.0 mm (-2.4 to 144.5) for physical function (total scale 1700 mm), and 4.3 mm (-1.2 to 9.8) for PGA (total scale 100 mm). The CI for each efficacy variable fell within the predefined equivalence ranges (pain, +/- 75 mm; physical function, +/- 255 mm; PGA, +/- 20 mm), indicating that no clinically relevant difference was found between the 2 treatment arms. Safety analyses of patients applying topical diclofenac solution revealed some minor skin irritation at the application site--mostly skin dryness in 83/311 (27%) patients--but a significantly reduced incidence, relative to oral diclofenac, of total and severe gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, including dyspepsia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and nausea. The number of patients developing abnormal liver function tests (including clinically significant elevation), hemoglobin, and creatinine clearance was significantly higher in the oral diclofenac group.
Application of this topical diclofenac solution to the knee of patients with OA produced relief of symptoms equivalent to oral diclofenac, with minor local skin irritation, but significantly reduced incidence of diclofenac-related GI complaints and abnormal laboratory values.
在一项随机、双盲、双模拟等效性试验中,比较双氯芬酸溶液局部用药与双氯芬酸口服给药缓解膝关节原发性骨关节炎(OA)症状的安全性和有效性。
共有622名有原发性膝关节OA影像学证据且有轻至重度症状的男性和女性被随机分配接受双氯芬酸溶液局部用药加安慰剂口服胶囊治疗,或安慰剂局部溶液加双氯芬酸(50毫克)口服胶囊治疗。患者每天3次,每次使用50滴研究溶液并服用1粒研究胶囊,持续12周。疗效变量包括疼痛和身体功能,通过西安大略和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)VA 3.1 OA指数以及患者整体评估(PGA)进行测量。符合方案组的等效性基于先前定义的具有临床意义的差异范围。通过评估不良事件、生命体征和实验室数据来评估安全性。
治疗之间平均(95%CI)变化评分(最终值减去基线值)的差异在疼痛方面(总分500毫米)为13.3毫米(-8.6至35.2),身体功能方面(总分1700毫米)为71.0毫米(-2.4至144.5),PGA方面(总分100毫米)为4.3毫米(-1.2至9.8)。每个疗效变量的CI均落在预先定义的等效范围内(疼痛,±75毫米;身体功能,±255毫米;PGA,±20毫米),表明两个治疗组之间未发现临床相关差异。对使用双氯芬酸溶液局部用药的患者进行的安全性分析显示,用药部位有一些轻微的皮肤刺激——83/311(27%)患者主要为皮肤干燥——但与口服双氯芬酸相比,包括消化不良、腹痛、腹泻和恶心在内的总体及严重胃肠道(GI)不良事件的发生率显著降低。口服双氯芬酸组肝功能检查异常(包括具有临床意义的升高)、血红蛋白和肌酐清除率异常的患者数量显著更高。
将这种双氯芬酸溶液局部应用于OA患者的膝关节可产生与口服双氯芬酸相当的症状缓解效果,局部皮肤刺激轻微,但双氯芬酸相关的胃肠道不适和实验室值异常的发生率显著降低。