Wysocki Charles J, Preti George
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2004 Nov;281(1):1201-11. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.20125.
Among primates in general, pheromones are of variable importance to social communication. Data on humans have generated the greatest controversy regarding the existence of pheromonal communication. In this review, the likelihood of pheromonal communication in humans is assessed with a discussion of chemical compounds produced by the axilla that may function as pheromones; the likelihood that the vomeronasal organ (VNO), a putative pheromone receptor organ in many other mammals, is functional in humans; and the possible ways pheromones operate in humans. In the human axilla, the interactions between the cutaneous microflora and axillary secretions render this region analogous to scent glands found in other primates. Both the chemistry of axillary secretions and their effects on conspecifics in humans appear to be analogous to other mammalian pheromone systems. Whichever chemical compounds serve a pheromonal function in humans, another unknown is the receptor. Although the VNO has been implicated in the reception of pheromones in many vertebrates, it is not the only pathway through which such information has access to the central nervous system; there is ample evidence to support the view that the olfactory epithelium can respond to pheromones. Furthermore, if a chemical activates receptors within the VNO, this does not necessarily mean that the compound is a pheromone. An important caveat for humans is that critical components typically found within the functioning VNO of other, nonprimate, mammals are lacking, suggesting that the human VNO does not function in the way that has been described for other mammals. In a broader perspective, pheromones can be classified as primers, signalers, modulators, and releasers. There is good evidence to support the presence of the former three in humans. Examples include affects on the menstrual cycle (primer effects); olfactory recognition of newborn by its mother (signaler); individuals may exude different odors based on mood (suggestive of modulator effects). However, there is no good evidence for releaser effects in adult humans. It is emphasized that no bioassay-guided study has led to the isolation of true human pheromones, a step that will elucidate specific functions to human chemical signals.
一般来说,在灵长类动物中,信息素对社交交流的重要性各不相同。关于人类是否存在信息素交流的数据引发了最大的争议。在这篇综述中,我们评估了人类进行信息素交流的可能性,讨论了腋窝产生的可能作为信息素的化合物;犁鼻器(VNO)在人类中是否具有功能,犁鼻器在许多其他哺乳动物中被认为是一种假定的信息素受体器官;以及信息素在人类中发挥作用的可能方式。在人类腋窝中,皮肤微生物群与腋窝分泌物之间的相互作用使该区域类似于其他灵长类动物中发现的气味腺。腋窝分泌物的化学成分及其对同种个体的影响似乎与其他哺乳动物的信息素系统类似。无论哪些化合物在人类中发挥信息素功能,另一个未知因素是受体。尽管犁鼻器在许多脊椎动物中与信息素的接收有关,但它并不是此类信息进入中枢神经系统的唯一途径;有充分的证据支持嗅觉上皮细胞可以对信息素做出反应这一观点。此外,如果一种化学物质激活了犁鼻器内的受体,这并不一定意味着该化合物就是一种信息素。对人类来说,一个重要的警告是,其他非灵长类哺乳动物功能正常的犁鼻器中通常存在的关键成分在人类中并不存在,这表明人类犁鼻器的功能方式与其他哺乳动物不同。从更广泛的角度来看,信息素可以分为启动素、信号素、调节剂和释放素。有充分的证据支持人类中存在前三种类型。例如,对月经周期的影响(启动素作用);母亲对新生儿的嗅觉识别(信号素);个体可能根据情绪散发出不同的气味(暗示调节剂作用)。然而,没有充分的证据证明成年人类中存在释放素作用。需要强调的是,尚无生物测定引导的研究能够分离出真正的人类信息素,而这一步骤将阐明人类化学信号的具体功能。