Watanabe Katsumi, Paik Young, Blake Randolph
Visual Cognition Group, Institute for Human Science and Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, AIST Tsukuba Central 6, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan.
Vision Res. 2004 Dec;44(26):3065-71. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.011.
Binocular rivalry elevates contrast increment thresholds for the detection of a transient stimulus presented to the suppressed eye, while thresholds measured during dominance are identical to those during monocular viewing (e.g. [Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 90-94]). It is well established that contrast increment thresholds depend on reference (pedestal) contrast. With high contrasts, increment thresholds increase with pedestal contrast, reflecting a gain control with sigmoidal non-linearity. We examined how this gain control mechanism operates during binocular rivalry (i.e., with and without perception of a pedestal mask). Subjects viewed a horizontal sine-wave grating (steady pedestal) and a radial checkerboard dichoptically. When the grating achieved a pre-specified phenomenal state (dominance or suppressed), subjects initiated the transient presentation (500-ms Gaussian pulse) of a contrast increment of the same spatial frequency. The pulse appeared in either the upper or lower half of the pedestal. Subjects indicated which half of the pedestal contained the pulse. Contrast increment thresholds were measured using a staircase method with various pedestal contrasts, which yielded threshold versus contrast (TvC) functions during dominance and suppression. The measured thresholds were reliably higher during suppression, but the rising slopes of TvC functions did not differ significantly between dominance and suppression (i.e., constant upward shift of TvC function). A control experiment demonstrated that the TvC function during dominance was identical to that during non-rivalry, monocular viewing. Evidently, the contrast gain control for transient luminance increment does not require the perception of pedestal contrast.
双眼竞争会提高检测呈现给被抑制眼的瞬态刺激的对比度增量阈值,而在优势眼期间测量的阈值与单眼观察期间的阈值相同(例如[威尔士,R.,& 福克斯,R.(1970年)。双眼竞争抑制期间的增量检测阈值。知觉与心理物理学,8,90 - 94])。众所周知,对比度增量阈值取决于参考(基座)对比度。对于高对比度,增量阈值随基座对比度增加,反映出具有S形非线性的增益控制。我们研究了这种增益控制机制在双眼竞争期间(即有和没有基座掩模感知的情况下)是如何运作的。受试者通过双眼分别观看水平正弦波光栅(稳定基座)和径向棋盘格。当光栅达到预先指定的现象状态(优势或被抑制)时,受试者启动相同空间频率的对比度增量的瞬态呈现(500毫秒高斯脉冲)。脉冲出现在基座的上半部分或下半部分。受试者指出基座的哪一半包含脉冲。使用阶梯法在各种基座对比度下测量对比度增量阈值,从而得出优势眼和抑制眼期间的阈值与对比度(TvC)函数。在抑制期间测量的阈值可靠地更高,但TvC函数的上升斜率在优势眼和抑制眼之间没有显著差异(即TvC函数的恒定向上偏移)。一项对照实验表明,优势眼期间的TvC函数与非竞争单眼观察期间的相同。显然,瞬态亮度增量的对比度增益控制不需要基座对比度的感知。