Kang Min-Suk, Lee Sang-Hun, Kim June, Heeger David, Blake Randolph
Department of Psychology and Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
J Vis. 2010 Sep 2;10(11):3. doi: 10.1167/10.11.3.
The role of collinear facilitation was investigated to test predictions of a model for traveling waves of dominance during binocular rivalry (H. Wilson, R. Blake, & S. Lee, 2001). In Experiment 1, we characterized traveling wave dynamics using a recently developed technique called periodic perturbation (M.-S. Kang, D. Heeger, & R. Blake, 2009). Results reveal that the propagation speed of waves for a collinear stimulus increased regardless of whether that stimulus was suppressed (replicating earlier work) or dominant; this latter finding is contrary to the model's prediction. In Experiment 2, we measured perceptual dominance durations within a localized region in the center of two rival stimuli that varied in degree of collinearity. Results reveal that increased collinearity did not change average dominance durations regardless of the rivalry phase of the stimulus, again contrary to the model's prediction. Incorporating pattern-dependent modulation of adaptation rate into the model accounted for results from both experiments. Using model simulations, we show how interactions between collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation may influence the dynamics of binocular rivalry. We also discuss alternative interpretations of our findings, including the possible role of surround suppression.
研究了共线促进作用,以检验双眼竞争期间优势行波模型的预测(H. 威尔逊、R. 布莱克和S. 李,2001年)。在实验1中,我们使用一种名为周期性微扰的最新技术(M.-S. 康、D. 黑格和R. 布莱克,2009年)来表征行波动力学。结果显示,无论共线刺激是被抑制(重复早期研究)还是占主导地位,其波的传播速度都会增加;后一发现与该模型的预测相反。在实验2中,我们测量了两个竞争刺激中心局部区域内的感知主导持续时间,这两个刺激的共线程度有所不同。结果显示,无论刺激的竞争阶段如何,共线性增加都不会改变平均主导持续时间,这同样与该模型的预测相反。将依赖模式的适应率调制纳入该模型可以解释两个实验的结果。通过模型模拟,我们展示了共线促进作用与依赖模式的适应之间的相互作用可能如何影响双眼竞争的动力学。我们还讨论了对我们研究结果的其他解释,包括周边抑制的可能作用。