Suppr超能文献

通过共线促进和模式依赖适应对双眼竞争的时空动态进行调制。

Modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry by collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation.

作者信息

Kang Min-Suk, Lee Sang-Hun, Kim June, Heeger David, Blake Randolph

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2010 Sep 2;10(11):3. doi: 10.1167/10.11.3.

Abstract

The role of collinear facilitation was investigated to test predictions of a model for traveling waves of dominance during binocular rivalry (H. Wilson, R. Blake, & S. Lee, 2001). In Experiment 1, we characterized traveling wave dynamics using a recently developed technique called periodic perturbation (M.-S. Kang, D. Heeger, & R. Blake, 2009). Results reveal that the propagation speed of waves for a collinear stimulus increased regardless of whether that stimulus was suppressed (replicating earlier work) or dominant; this latter finding is contrary to the model's prediction. In Experiment 2, we measured perceptual dominance durations within a localized region in the center of two rival stimuli that varied in degree of collinearity. Results reveal that increased collinearity did not change average dominance durations regardless of the rivalry phase of the stimulus, again contrary to the model's prediction. Incorporating pattern-dependent modulation of adaptation rate into the model accounted for results from both experiments. Using model simulations, we show how interactions between collinear facilitation and pattern-dependent adaptation may influence the dynamics of binocular rivalry. We also discuss alternative interpretations of our findings, including the possible role of surround suppression.

摘要

研究了共线促进作用,以检验双眼竞争期间优势行波模型的预测(H. 威尔逊、R. 布莱克和S. 李,2001年)。在实验1中,我们使用一种名为周期性微扰的最新技术(M.-S. 康、D. 黑格和R. 布莱克,2009年)来表征行波动力学。结果显示,无论共线刺激是被抑制(重复早期研究)还是占主导地位,其波的传播速度都会增加;后一发现与该模型的预测相反。在实验2中,我们测量了两个竞争刺激中心局部区域内的感知主导持续时间,这两个刺激的共线程度有所不同。结果显示,无论刺激的竞争阶段如何,共线性增加都不会改变平均主导持续时间,这同样与该模型的预测相反。将依赖模式的适应率调制纳入该模型可以解释两个实验的结果。通过模型模拟,我们展示了共线促进作用与依赖模式的适应之间的相互作用可能如何影响双眼竞争的动力学。我们还讨论了对我们研究结果的其他解释,包括周边抑制的可能作用。

相似文献

4
Interactions between binocular rivalry and Gestalt formation.
Vision Res. 2005 Sep;45(19):2571-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.005.
5
Perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry is prolonged by a dynamic surround.
Vision Res. 2013 Nov;92:33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory.
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(21):2741-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
7
Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry.
Vision Res. 2008 Aug;48(17):1798-803. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.010. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
8
Spatio-temporal dynamics of the visual system revealed in binocular rivalry.
Neurosci Lett. 2005;381(1-2):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.01.087. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
9
Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry.
J Vis. 2010 Aug 26;10(10):27. doi: 10.1167/10.10.27.
10
When can attention influence binocular rivalry?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Aug;77(6):1908-18. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0905-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextual Binocular Imbalance Impairs Local Stereopsis.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Mar 3;66(3):6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.3.6.
3
Adaptation to transients disrupts spatial coherence in binocular rivalry.
Sci Rep. 2020 May 26;10(1):8673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65678-7.
4
Evidence for neural rhythms embedded within binocular rivalry.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 23;116(30):14811-14812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905174116. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
5
Autistic Traits Are Not a Strong Predictor of Binocular Rivalry Dynamics.
Front Neurosci. 2018 May 17;12:338. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00338. eCollection 2018.
6
On the Effects on Cortical Spontaneous Activity of the Symmetries of the Network of Pinwheels in Visual Area V1.
J Math Neurosci. 2015 Dec;5(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13408-015-0023-8. Epub 2015 May 30.
7
Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Feb;36(2):566-76. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22647. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
8
Motion-induced blindness and Troxler fading: common and different mechanisms.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092894. eCollection 2014.
9
Normal binocular rivalry in autism: implications for the excitation/inhibition imbalance hypothesis.
Vision Res. 2013 Jan 25;77:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
10
An integrated framework of spatiotemporal dynamics of binocular rivalry.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Aug 30;5:88. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00088. eCollection 2011.

本文引用的文献

1
What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):179-86. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.1.179.
4
Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics.
J Vis. 2009 Jan 15;9(1):17.1-11. doi: 10.1167/9.1.17.
5
Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability.
J Comput Neurosci. 2009 Aug;27(1):37-54. doi: 10.1007/s10827-008-0125-3. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
6
Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory.
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(21):2741-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
7
Stimulus motion propels traveling waves in binocular rivalry.
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 15;2(8):e739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000739.
8
Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1125-39. doi: 10.1152/jn.00116.2007. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
9
Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.
J Vis. 2006 Oct 23;6(11):1224-43. doi: 10.1167/6.11.7.
10
Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry.
J Vis. 2006 Feb 21;6(4):304-10. doi: 10.1167/6.4.1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验