Suppr超能文献

SAGE、长链SAGE和寡核苷酸芯片所产生的基因表达谱比较。

A comparison of gene expression profiles produced by SAGE, long SAGE, and oligonucleotide chips.

作者信息

Lu Jun, Lal Anita, Merriman Barry, Nelson Stan, Riggins Gregory

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Genomics. 2004 Oct;84(4):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.06.014.

Abstract

A comparison study of short SAGE versus GeneChip and long SAGE was conducted to determine if data were interchangeable between the techniques. Although SAGE and Affymetrix chip expression levels showed a significant correlation using the set of genes for which there was reliable and unambiguous mapping from tag-to-gene identification, correlation coefficients were low (0.51 for the Spearman's correlation coefficient with p < 0.0001). A quantitative analysis comparing the use of 10-bp SAGE tags to 17-bp SAGE tags indicated that the short SAGE technology was more efficient at identifying differentially expressed tags. However, 4-7% of the 10-bp tags were redundancies that could have been resolved by long SAGE and 10-20% of the short SAGE tags had no obvious match to currently annotated human transcript sequences.

摘要

进行了一项短SAGE与基因芯片及长SAGE的比较研究,以确定这些技术之间的数据是否可互换。尽管使用从标签到基因识别有可靠且明确映射的基因集时,SAGE和Affymetrix芯片的表达水平显示出显著相关性,但相关系数较低(Spearman相关系数为0.51,p < 0.0001)。一项比较10碱基对SAGE标签与17碱基对SAGE标签使用情况的定量分析表明,短SAGE技术在识别差异表达标签方面更有效。然而,10碱基对标签中有4 - 7%是冗余的,可通过长SAGE解决,且10 - 20%的短SAGE标签与当前注释的人类转录本序列无明显匹配。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验