• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较质量控制规则检测随机误差持续增加的能力。

Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.

作者信息

Parvin C A

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1992 Mar;38(3):364-9.

PMID:1547553
Abstract

This paper continues an investigation into the merits of an alternative approach to the statistical evaluation of quality-control rules. In this report, computer simulation is used to evaluate and compare quality-control rules designed to detect increases in within-run or between-run imprecision. When out-of-control conditions are evaluated in terms of their impact on total analytical imprecision, the error detection ability of a rule depends on the relative magnitudes of the between-run and within-run error components under stable operating conditions. A recently proposed rule based on the F-test, designed to detect increases in between-run imprecision, is shown to have relatively poor performance characteristics. Additionally, several issues are examined that have been difficult to address with the traditional evaluation approach.

摘要

本文继续探讨一种用于质量控制规则统计评估的替代方法的优点。在本报告中,使用计算机模拟来评估和比较旨在检测批内或批间不精密度增加的质量控制规则。当根据失控条件对总分析不精密度的影响来评估时,规则的误差检测能力取决于稳定操作条件下批间和批内误差分量的相对大小。最近提出的一种基于F检验的规则,旨在检测批间不精密度的增加,但其性能特征相对较差。此外,还研究了一些传统评估方法难以解决的问题。

相似文献

1
Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.比较质量控制规则检测随机误差持续增加的能力。
Clin Chem. 1992 Mar;38(3):364-9.
2
Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent systematic error.比较质量控制规则检测持续性系统误差的能力。
Clin Chem. 1992 Mar;38(3):358-63.
3
Selecting Statistical Quality Control Procedures for Limiting the Impact of Increases in Analytical Random Error on Patient Safety.选择统计质量控制程序以限制分析随机误差增加对患者安全的影响。
Clin Chem. 2017 May;63(5):1022-1030. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.267682. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
4
Choosing quality-control systems to detect maximum clinically allowable analytical errors.选择质量控制系统以检测最大临床允许分析误差。
Clin Chem. 1989 Feb;35(2):284-8.
5
New insight into the comparative power of quality-control rules that use control observations within a single analytical run.对在单次分析运行中使用控制观测值的质量控制规则的比较效能的新见解。
Clin Chem. 1993 Mar;39(3):440-7.
6
Influence of a between-run component of variation, choice of control limits, and shape of error distribution on the performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control.批间变异成分、控制限的选择以及误差分布形状对内部质量控制规则性能特征的影响。
Clin Chem. 1979 Mar;25(3):394-400.
7
A tool for the design and evaluation of alternative quality-control procedures.一种用于设计和评估替代质量控制程序的工具。
Clin Chem. 1992 Feb;38(2):204-10.
8
Estimating the performance characteristics of quality-control procedures when error persists until detection.当误差持续存在直至被检测到时,估计质量控制程序的性能特征。
Clin Chem. 1991 Oct;37(10 Pt 1):1720-4.
9
Design and evaluation of statistical control procedures: applications of a computer "quality control simulator" program.统计控制程序的设计与评估:计算机“质量控制模拟器”程序的应用
Clin Chem. 1981 Sep;27(9):1536-45.
10
Performance characteristics of rules for internal quality control: probabilities for false rejection and error detection.内部质量控制规则的性能特征:错误拒收概率和误差检测概率
Clin Chem. 1977 Oct;23(10):1857-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision, accuracy, and data acceptance criteria in biopharmaceutical analysis.生物制药分析中的精密度、准确度和数据接受标准。
Pharm Res. 1993 Oct;10(10):1420-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1018958805795.