Gerson Lauren B, Groeneveld Peter W, Triadafilopoulos George
Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5202, USA.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Oct;2(10):868-79. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00394-5.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic screening and periodic surveillance for patients with Barrett's esophagus has been shown to be cost-effective in patients with esophageal dysplasia, with treatment for esophageal cancer limited to esophagectomy. Most gastroenterologists refer patients with high-grade dysplasia for esophagectomy, and effective endoscopic therapies are available for nonoperative patients with esophageal cancer. The cost-effectiveness of screening strategies that incorporate these nonsurgical treatment modalities has not been determined.
We designed a Markov model to compare lifetime costs and life expectancy for a cohort of 50-year-old men with chronic reflux symptoms. We compared 10 clinical strategies incorporating combinations of screening and surveillance protocols (no screening, screening with periodic surveillance for both dysplastic and nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus, or periodic surveillance for dysplasia only), treatment for high-grade dysplasia (esophagectomy or intensive surveillance), and treatment for cancer (esophagectomy or surgical and endoscopic treatment options).
Screening and surveillance of patients with both dysplastic and nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus followed by esophagectomy for surgical candidates with high-grade dysplasia or esophageal cancer and endoscopic therapy for cancer patients who were not operative candidates cost $12,140 per life-year gained compared to no screening. Other screening strategies, including strategies that had no endoscopic treatment options, were either less effective at the same cost, or equally effective at a higher cost.
The cost-effectiveness of screening and subsequent surveillance of patients with dysplastic as well as nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus followed by endoscopic or surgical therapy in patients who develop cancer compares favorably to many widely accepted screening strategies for cancer.
对于巴雷特食管患者,内镜筛查和定期监测已被证明在食管发育异常患者中具有成本效益,食管癌的治疗仅限于食管切除术。大多数胃肠病学家会将高级别发育异常患者转诊进行食管切除术,对于非手术治疗的食管癌患者也有有效的内镜治疗方法。尚未确定纳入这些非手术治疗方式的筛查策略的成本效益。
我们设计了一个马尔可夫模型,以比较一组有慢性反流症状的50岁男性的终生成本和预期寿命。我们比较了10种临床策略,这些策略结合了筛查和监测方案的组合(不筛查、对发育异常和非发育异常的巴雷特食管进行定期筛查或仅对发育异常进行定期监测)、高级别发育异常的治疗(食管切除术或强化监测)以及癌症的治疗(食管切除术或手术及内镜治疗选择)。
与不筛查相比,对发育异常和非发育异常的巴雷特食管患者进行筛查和监测,随后对有高级别发育异常或食管癌的手术候选者进行食管切除术,对非手术候选的癌症患者进行内镜治疗,每获得一个生命年的成本为12,140美元。其他筛查策略,包括没有内镜治疗选择的策略,要么在相同成本下效果较差,要么在更高成本下效果相同。
对发育异常和非发育异常的巴雷特食管患者进行筛查及后续监测,随后对发生癌症的患者进行内镜或手术治疗,其成本效益与许多广泛接受的癌症筛查策略相比具有优势。