Madias John E
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York University, Division of Cardiology, Elmhurst Hospital Center, New York, New York, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2004 Oct;17(10):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.05.011.
Diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is primarily based on measurements of R- and S-waves from various electrocardiographic (ECG) leads. Recent information has shown that anasarca peripheral edema (AN) (defined as fluid accumulation diagnosed by weight gain, positive fluid intake/output records, and pitting edema in the lower extremities and rest of the body, particularly in the dorsal region) leads to attenuation in the amplitude of QRS complexes and consequently could interfere with the diagnosis of LVH. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the diagnosis of LVH is concealed by AN.
Conventional ECG measurements and diagnostic binary characterization according to the Cornell, Sokolow-Lyon, and Romhilt-Estes systems were carried out in 14 patients with LVH (six patients with AN and eight patients admitted contemporaneously who did not gain weight during their hospitalization and who served as control subjects). The patients with AN were evaluated on admission (before the development of AN), and on the days of half of peak weight (HF-W) gain, peak weight (P-W) gain, and the lowest subsequent weight (L-W). The control subjects were evaluated on admission and at discharge. Analyses included the following: characterization by the three LVH diagnostic instruments mentioned previously; QRS amplitude measurements for the assessment of LVH before and after development of AN; and comparisons of the AN patients with the control subjects.
Measurements and binary characterization was diagnostic of LVH on admission by design for all 14 patients. However, although such characterization remained unaltered for the control subjects, the patients with AN revealed statistically significant drops in all ECG measurements on the days of HF-W gain (P = .016 to .0005) and P-W gain (P = .02 to .0005), at which points the diagnosis of LVH could no longer anymore substantiated.
The results of this study indicate that AN interferes with electrocardiographically based diagnosis of LVH. This has clinical implications because accurate characterization of the presence or absence of LVH is unattainable in patients with AN and should await abatement of the edematous state. The previously stated can be extrapolated to the patients with congestive heart failure who have gone on to develop right heart failure and AN, or to patients with end-stage renal failure who also reveal attenuation of the ECG QRS potentials at the stage of poor compensation of their edematous state.
左心室肥厚(LVH)的诊断主要基于对各种心电图(ECG)导联R波和S波的测量。最近的信息表明,全身性外周水肿(AN)(定义为通过体重增加、液体摄入/输出记录阳性以及下肢和身体其他部位(特别是背部区域)的凹陷性水肿诊断出的液体蓄积)会导致QRS波群振幅衰减,从而可能干扰LVH的诊断。本研究的目的是评估LVH的诊断是否被AN掩盖。
对14例LVH患者(6例有AN的患者和8例同期入院且住院期间体重未增加的患者,后者作为对照)进行了常规心电图测量,并根据康奈尔、索科洛夫-里昂和罗姆希尔特-埃斯蒂斯系统进行诊断性二元特征分析。对有AN的患者在入院时(AN出现之前)、体重增加至峰值一半(HF-W)、体重增加至峰值(P-W)以及随后体重最低时(L-W)进行评估。对对照患者在入院时和出院时进行评估。分析包括以下内容:用上述三种LVH诊断工具进行特征分析;在AN出现之前和之后测量QRS振幅以评估LVH;以及将有AN的患者与对照患者进行比较。
按照设计,所有14例患者入院时的测量和二元特征分析均诊断为LVH。然而,尽管对照患者的此类特征保持不变,但有AN的患者在HF-W增加日(P = 0.016至0.0005)和P-W增加日(P = 0.02至0.0005)时,所有心电图测量值均出现统计学上的显著下降,此时LVH的诊断不再成立。
本研究结果表明,AN会干扰基于心电图的LVH诊断。这具有临床意义,因为在有AN的患者中无法准确判断是否存在LVH,应等待水肿状态消退。上述情况可外推至已发展为右心衰竭和AN的充血性心力衰竭患者,或在水肿状态代偿不良阶段心电图QRS电位也会衰减的终末期肾衰竭患者。