• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接冠状动脉血管成形术后的心肌存活性:小剂量多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图与心肌对比超声心动图的比较

Myocardial viability after primary coronary angioplasty: low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography versus myocardial contrast echocardiography.

作者信息

Morello Mara, Bricco Giuliana, Calachanis Marco, Paglia Irene, Sheiban Imad, Mangiardi Lucia, Trevi Gian Paolo

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Ital Heart J. 2004 Jul;5(7):530-5.

PMID:15487271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves survival. Indeed, after AMI myocardial dysfunction may be reversible (hibernating or stunned myocardium). Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE) provides us with the possibility of evaluating viable myocardial segments, while myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) allows the study of the microcirculation in the same myocardial areas. The aim of our study was to compare LDDSE and MCE, in the prediction of the recovery of segments in patients with AMI who were submitted to primary coronary angioplasty (PTCA).

METHODS

We studied 14 patients with AMI. Both LDDSE and MCE with Levovist were performed after primary PTCA. The viability gold standard was a recovery of contractility detected at echocardiography 2 months later.

RESULTS

For LDDSE, the sensitivity was 91%, the specificity 71% and the positive and negative predictive values were 93 and 64% respectively. For MCE, the sensitivity was 94%, the specificity 44%, the positive predictive value 89%, and the negative predictive value 59%. Two tests agreed in 81% of the cases. Stress echocardiography and contrast echocardiography agreed in 81% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

LDDSE has a very good positive accuracy, it has an acceptable negative predictive value and is relatively cheap. On the other hand, MCE has a good positive accuracy, but a low negative accuracy and carries a high cost. The integration of these two tests, which are too expensive in clinical practice, could improve our comprehension of the post-PTCA pathophysiology.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者成功的再灌注治疗可提高生存率。事实上,AMI后心肌功能障碍可能是可逆的(心肌冬眠或心肌顿抑)。小剂量多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(LDDSE)为我们评估存活心肌节段提供了可能,而心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)则可研究相同心肌区域的微循环。我们研究的目的是比较LDDSE和MCE在预测接受直接冠状动脉血管成形术(PTCA)的AMI患者节段恢复情况方面的差异。

方法

我们研究了14例AMI患者。在直接PTCA后进行了LDDSE和使用Levovist的MCE检查。存活心肌的金标准是2个月后超声心动图检测到的收缩力恢复。

结果

对于LDDSE,敏感性为91%,特异性为71%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为93%和64%。对于MCE,敏感性为94%,特异性为44%,阳性预测值为89%,阴性预测值为59%。两种检查在81%的病例中结果一致。负荷超声心动图和对比超声心动图在81%的病例中结果一致。

结论

LDDSE具有非常好的阳性准确性,其阴性预测值可接受且相对便宜。另一方面,MCE具有良好的阳性准确性,但阴性准确性较低且成本高昂。这两种在临床实践中成本过高的检查相结合,可能会增进我们对PTCA后病理生理学的理解。

相似文献

1
Myocardial viability after primary coronary angioplasty: low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography versus myocardial contrast echocardiography.直接冠状动脉血管成形术后的心肌存活性:小剂量多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图与心肌对比超声心动图的比较
Ital Heart J. 2004 Jul;5(7):530-5.
2
Detecting myocardial salvage after primary PTCA: early myocardial contrast echocardiography versus delayed sestamibi perfusion imaging.直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)后检测心肌挽救:早期心肌对比超声心动图与延迟的锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈(sestamibi)灌注成像的比较
J Nucl Med. 1999 Mar;40(3):363-70.
3
Identification of stunned myocardium with parametric imaging-based, quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction.基于参数成像的定量心肌对比超声心动图在急性心肌梗死后对心肌顿抑的识别
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 15;96(2):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.037.
4
Comparison of real-time contrast echocardiography and low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting the left ventricular functional recovery in patients after acute myocardial infarction under different therapeutic intervention.不同治疗干预下实时对比超声心动图与小剂量多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图对急性心肌梗死后患者左心室功能恢复预测价值的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2005 Sep 15;104(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.12.022.
5
Detection of myocardial viability by contrast echocardiography in acute infarction predicts recovery of resting function and contractile reserve.急性心肌梗死时经对比超声心动图检测心肌存活性可预测静息功能及收缩储备的恢复。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 5;41(5):827-33. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02962-5.
6
Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus dobutamine echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty.心肌对比超声心动图与多巴酚丁胺超声心动图对预测直接冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死后功能恢复的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Dec;28(7):1677-83. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00400-7.
7
Acute myocardial infarction early viability assessment by 64-slice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography: comparison with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography.冠状动脉造影术后立即采用64层计算机断层扫描评估急性心肌梗死早期心肌存活情况:与小剂量多巴酚丁胺超声心动图的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Mar 20;49(11):1178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.032. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
8
Role of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography in the assessment of viability after acute myocardial infarction and angioplasty.实时心肌对比超声心动图在急性心肌梗死及血管成形术后存活心肌评估中的作用
Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Oct;23(10):1277-87.
9
The use of myocardial contrast echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular function recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.心肌对比超声心动图在急性心肌梗死背景下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后左心室功能恢复评估中的应用。
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Jul;64(7):713-21; discussion 722-3.
10
Incremental value of myocardial contrast echocardiography for the prediction of recovery of function in dobutamine nonresponsive myocardium early after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后早期多巴酚丁胺无反应心肌中,心肌对比超声心动图对预测功能恢复的增量价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Feb 15;91(4):397-402. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03232-0.