Barnes Josephine, Scahill Rachael I, Boyes Richard G, Frost Chris, Lewis Emma B, Rossor Charlotte L, Rossor Martin N, Fox Nick C
Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 8-11 Queen Square, WCIN 3BG, London, UK.
Neuroimage. 2004 Oct;23(2):574-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.028.
Manual segmentation of the hippocampus is the gold standard in volumetric hippocampal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis; however, this is difficult to achieve reproducibly. This study explores whether application of local registration and calculation of the hippocampal boundary shift integral (HBSI) can reduce random variation compared with manual measures. Hippocampi were outlined on the baseline and registered-repeat MRIs of 32 clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and 47 matched controls (37-86 years) with a wide range of scanning intervals (175-1173 days). The scans were globally registered using 9 degrees of freedom and subsequently locally registered using 6 degrees of freedom and HBSI was then calculated automatically. HBSI significantly reduced the mean rate (P < 0.01) and variation in controls (P < 0.001) and increased group separation between AD cases and controls. When comparing HBSI atrophy rates with manually derived atrophy rates at 90% sensitivity, specificities were 98% and 81%, respectively. From logistic regression models, a 1% increase in HBSI atrophy rates was associated with an 11-fold (CI 3, 36) increase in the odds of a diagnosis of AD. For manually derived atrophy rates, the equivalent odds ratio was 3 (CI 2,4). We conclude that HBSI-derived atrophy rates reduce operator time and error, and are at least as effective as the manual equivalent as a diagnostic marker and are a potential marker of progression in longitudinal studies and trials.
海马体的手动分割是海马体容积磁共振成像(MRI)分析的金标准;然而,要实现可重复性却很困难。本研究探讨了与手动测量相比,应用局部配准和计算海马体边界位移积分(HBSI)是否能减少随机变化。在32例临床诊断为阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和47例匹配对照(37 - 86岁)的基线和重复扫描MRI上勾勒出海马体,扫描间隔范围广泛(175 - 1173天)。扫描首先使用9个自由度进行全局配准,随后使用6个自由度进行局部配准,然后自动计算HBSI。HBSI显著降低了对照组的平均速率(P < 0.01)和变异性(P < 0.001),并增加了AD病例与对照组之间的组间差异。当以90%的敏感度将HBSI萎缩率与手动得出的萎缩率进行比较时,特异性分别为98%和81%。从逻辑回归模型来看,HBSI萎缩率每增加1%,AD诊断几率增加11倍(CI 3, 36)。对于手动得出的萎缩率,等效比值比为3(CI 2,4)。我们得出结论,HBSI得出的萎缩率减少了操作人员的时间和误差,作为诊断标志物至少与手动方法等效,并且在纵向研究和试验中是进展情况的潜在标志物。