Nix W A, Scherer A
Department of Neurology, University Clinics, Mainz, Germany.
Muscle Nerve. 1992 Feb;15(2):193-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.880150211.
The values obtained from two different macro EMG methods were compared, and found to be different. Normally, macro electromyography (EMG) is performed with a modified single fiber (SF) needle using the SF potential as a trigger; a new method recommends a modified concentric needle and triggers on the concentric EMG signal. The concentric macro EMG has a 40% to 50% smaller amplitude and area values than data obtained with a SF macro EMG needle. The different values are the result of variant spatial relationships of the respective needles to the motor unit under study, and may be due to a recruitment-dependent bias resulting from different trigger properties of the two methods. The concentric macro EMG needle can be used to estimate motor unit size, to scan the unit, and to investigate its different concentric EMG signals.
对通过两种不同的宏观肌电图方法获得的值进行了比较,发现它们有所不同。通常,宏观肌电图(EMG)是使用改良的单纤维(SF)针以SF电位作为触发来进行的;一种新方法推荐使用改良的同心针,并以同心EMG信号作为触发。同心宏观肌电图的幅度和面积值比使用SF宏观肌电图针获得的数据小40%至50%。这些不同的值是由于各自的针与所研究的运动单位的空间关系不同所致,并且可能是由于两种方法不同的触发特性导致的与募集相关的偏差。同心宏观肌电图针可用于估计运动单位大小、扫描该单位并研究其不同的同心EMG信号。