Ghafouri Nazdar, Tiger Gunnar, Razdan Raj K, Mahadevan Anu, Pertwee Roger G, Martin Billy R, Fowler Christopher J
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Br J Pharmacol. 2004 Nov;143(6):774-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705948. Epub 2004 Oct 18.
The pharmacology of monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) is not well understood. In consequence, the abilities of a series of analogues of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) to inhibit cytosolic 2-oleoylglycerol and membrane-bound anandamide hydolysis by MAGL and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), respectively, have been investigated. 2-AG and its 1-regioisomer (1-AG) interacted with MAGL with similar affinities (IC(50) values 13 and 17 mum, respectively). Shorter homologues of 2-AG (2-linoleoylglycerol and 2-oleoylglycerol) had affinities for MAGL similar to 2-AG. This pattern was also seen when the arachidonoyl side chain of arachidonoyl trifluoromethylketone was replaced by an oleoyl side chain. Arachidonoyl serinol (IC(50) value 73 microM) was a weaker inhibitor of MAGL than 2-AG. The IC(50) values of noladin ether towards MAGL and FAAH were 36 and 3 microM, respectively. Arachidonoyl glycine interacted with FAAH (IC(50) value 4.9 microM) but only weakly interacted with MAGL (IC(50) value >100 microM). alpha-Methyl-1-AG had similar potencies towards MAGL and FAAH (IC(50) values of 11 and 33 microM, respectively). O-2203 (1-(20-cyano-16,16-dimethyl-eicosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenoyl) glycerol) and O-2204 (2-(20-hydroxy-16,16-dimethyl-eicosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenoyl) glycerol) were slightly less potent, but again affected both enzymes equally. alpha-Methyl-1-AG, O-2203 and O-2204 interacted only weakly with cannabinoid CB(1) receptors expressed in CHO cells (K(i) values 1.8, 3.7 and 3.2 microM, respectively, compared with 0.24 microM for 1-AG) and showed no evidence of central cannabinoid receptor activation in vivo at doses up to 30 mg kg(-1) i.v. It is concluded that compounds like alpha-Methyl-1-AG, O-2203 and O-2204 may be useful as leads for the discovery of selective MAGL inhibitors that lack direct effects upon cannabinoid receptors.
单酰甘油脂肪酶(MAGL)的药理学尚未得到充分了解。因此,研究了一系列2-花生四烯酰甘油(2-AG)类似物分别抑制MAGL介导的胞质2-油酰甘油水解以及脂肪酸酰胺水解酶(FAAH)介导的膜结合花生四烯乙醇胺水解的能力。2-AG及其1-区域异构体(1-AG)与MAGL相互作用的亲和力相似(IC50值分别为13和17 μM)。2-AG的较短同系物(2-亚油酰甘油和2-油酰甘油)对MAGL的亲和力与2-AG相似。当花生四烯酰三氟甲基酮的花生四烯酰侧链被油酰侧链取代时,也观察到了这种模式。花生四烯酰丝氨醇(IC50值为73 μM)对MAGL的抑制作用比2-AG弱。诺拉汀醚对MAGL和FAAH的IC50值分别为36和3 μM。花生四烯酰甘氨酸与FAAH相互作用(IC50值为4.9 μM),但与MAGL的相互作用较弱(IC50值>100 μM)。α-甲基-1-AG对MAGL和FAAH的效力相似(IC50值分别为11和33 μM)。O-2203(1-(20-氰基-16,16-二甲基-二十碳-5,8,11,14-四烯酰)甘油)和O-2204(2-(20-羟基-16,16-二甲基-二十碳-5,8,11,14-四烯酰)甘油)的效力略低,但同样对两种酶有同等影响。α-甲基-1-AG、O-2203和O-2204与CHO细胞中表达的大麻素CB1受体的相互作用较弱(Ki值分别为1.8、3.7和3.2 μM,而1-AG为0.24 μM),并且在静脉注射剂量高达30 mg·kg-1时,体内未显示出中枢大麻素受体激活的迹象。结论是,像α-甲基-1-AG、O-2203和O-2204这样的化合物可能有助于发现对大麻素受体无直接作用的选择性MAGL抑制剂。