Chung Brian H Y, Wong Virginia C N, Ip Patrick
Division of Neurodevelopmental Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e548-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0668. Epub 2004 Oct 18.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is common. The prevalence of SMA in southern Chinese is 1 in 53,000. The clinical course is variable. The traditional classification of SMA includes age of onset, age of death, achievement of motor milestones, and ambulatory status as criteria. There was a lack of inclusion of the best lifetime functional status of any child with SMA. With the advances in medical care, the life expectancy and ambulatory status of patients with SMA have improved. The objective of this study was to assess the survival pattern, ambulatory status, and functional status of children with SMA.
Patients with SMA were recruited from the neuromuscular clinic of the Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital, which is a university-affiliated hospital, and the Families of SMA in Hong Kong. By September 2002, 102 SMA cases had been registered in the Duchess of Kent Children's Hospital neuromuscular clinic and Families of SMA registry, and 83 patients were analyzed. Among them, 39 were recruited for the administration of Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM), an assessment tool for functional status that has been previously validated by us for Chinese children. The diagnosis of SMA was made from clinical history, serum muscle enzyme, electromyography, muscle biopsy, and, recently, by molecular studies. In Hong Kong, molecular tests of the survivor motor neuron gene was available since 1995. A total of 36 in our cohort of 83 patients had the diagnosis confirmed with molecular analyses. We adopted the classification of SMA from previous studies in which the criteria were based on the International SMA consortium (1992) with modifications according to the 59th European Neuromuscular Center International Workshops. As only SMA patients with childhood onset were studied, we did not include any type IV patients in our study. Parents were interviewed and records were reviewed for demographic and clinical data, including age of onset, gender, family history, motor milestones, disease progression, loss of motor function, and involvement of respiratory or bulbar muscles. We define the age of disease onset as the age in which the first abnormalities were obvious from the medical records or from the descriptions of the parents about the first signs of weakness, eg, age of achievement of certain motor milestones or loss of functions. For the ambulatory status, we define "being ambulatory" as having the ability to walk for 100 meters, either with assistance such as calipers or walkers or without assistance. Actuarial survival curves were obtained by using the Kaplan-Meier method for calculating survival probabilities and probabilities of remaining ambulatory. The parents or the chief caregivers were interviewed for functional status using WeeFIM at the last registered date in September 2002. The WeeFIM consists of 3 domains: 1) self-care, 2) mobility, and 3) cognition. The self-care domain consists of 8 items, namely eating, grooming, bathing, dressing (upper body), dressing (lower body), toileting, and bladder and bowel management. The mobility domain consists of 5 items: transfer from chair or wheelchair, transfer to toilet, transfer to tub or shower, walking/wheelchair/crawling distance, and moving up and down stairs. The cognition domain assesses comprehension, expression, social interaction, problem solving, and memory. A scoring scale from 1 to 7 was used (1 = total assistance, 2 = maximal assistance, 3 = moderate assistance, 4 = minimal contact assistance, 5 = supervision, 6 = modified independence, and 7 = complete independence). The maximum total WeeFIM score is 126, and the maximum score for self-care, mobility, and cognition are 56, 35, and 35, respectively.
For type I SMA (n = 22), the survival probabilities at 1, 2, 4, 10, and 20 years were 50%, 40%, 30%, 30%, and 30%, respectively. For type II SMA (n = 26), the survival probabilities at 1, 2, 4, 10, and 20 years were 100%, 100%, 100%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. Sixteen of the SMA I patients and 4 of the SMA II patients died of cardiorespiratory failure. The 5 surviving SMA I patients all were ventilator dependent. All SMA III patients were surviving at the time of study. The probability of remaining ambulatory at 2, 4, 10, and 20 years after onset was 100%, 100%, 81%, and 50% for type IIIa (age of onset <3 years) and 100%, 100%, 84%, and 68% for type IIIb (age of onset between 3 and 30 years), respectively. The interval between disease onset and inability to walk was 15.0 +/- 10.9 years (mean +/- standard deviation) and 21.2 +/- 11.7 years for patients with SMA IIIa and IIIb, respectively. Only 39 patients participated in the WeeFIM interview as 20 had already died at the time of study and 24 refused participation. No difference could be found in the age of onset, gender, or types of SMA between those who participated (n = 39) and those who did not (n = 24). The mean total WeeFIM quotients were 24% for SMA type 1, 57% for SMA type 11, 75% for SMA type IIIa, and 78% for SMA type IIIb. For the self-care domain, 100% SMA type I and 73% SMA type II patients required assistance, whereas 55% and 63% of SMA types IIIa and IIIb patients achieved functional independence. Bathing and dressing (upper and lower body) were items with which most SMA children required help or supervision. For the mobility domain, assistance was needed in >90% of SMA types I, II, and IIIa and in 63% of SMA type IIIb patients. Stair management was the major obstacle for independence in achieving mobility for all types of SMA. For the cognition domain, performance was the best among the 3 domains, and 60% of SMA type II, 78% of SMA type IIIa, and 90% of SMA type IIIb patients achieved functional independence. However, except for SMA type IIIb, a significant proportion of patients still need assistance or supervision in the area of problem solving. Statistically significant differences were found in the WeeFIM scores between type I and type II and between type IIIa and IIIb patients. However, no significant difference could be observed between type II and type IIIa SMA patients in the overall WeeFIM scores or performance in any of the 3 domains.
We found that there was improvement in survival in SMA patients as compared with other studies. Assistance or supervision was needed for the majority of SMA patients for both mobility and self-care domains. With improvement in survival as a result of medical advances, assessment of the most current or the best-ever functional status at a designated age might be an important criterion for classification of SMA.
脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)很常见。中国南方SMA的患病率为1/53000。其临床病程具有变异性。SMA的传统分类包括发病年龄、死亡年龄、运动里程碑的达成情况以及行走状态等标准。以往缺乏对任何SMA患儿最佳终身功能状态的考量。随着医疗护理的进步,SMA患者的预期寿命和行走状态有所改善。本研究的目的是评估SMA患儿的生存模式、行走状态和功能状态。
从大学附属医院肯特公爵夫人儿童医院的神经肌肉诊所及香港的SMA患者家庭招募SMA患者。截至2002年9月,肯特公爵夫人儿童医院神经肌肉诊所和SMA患者家庭登记处已登记102例SMA病例,对83例患者进行了分析。其中39例接受了儿童功能独立性测量(WeeFIM),这是一种我们之前已在中国儿童中验证过的功能状态评估工具。SMA的诊断基于临床病史、血清肌酶、肌电图、肌肉活检,以及最近的分子研究。在香港,自1995年起可进行存活运动神经元基因的分子检测。我们队列中的83例患者中有36例经分子分析确诊。我们采用了先前研究中的SMA分类,其标准基于国际SMA协会(1992年),并根据第59届欧洲神经肌肉中心国际研讨会进行了修改。由于仅研究儿童期发病的SMA患者,我们的研究未纳入任何IV型患者。对家长进行了访谈,并查阅记录以获取人口统计学和临床数据,包括发病年龄、性别、家族史、运动里程碑、疾病进展、运动功能丧失以及呼吸或延髓肌肉受累情况。我们将疾病发病年龄定义为从病历或家长对首次虚弱迹象的描述中首次出现明显异常的年龄,例如达到某些运动里程碑的年龄或功能丧失的年龄。对于行走状态,我们将“能够行走”定义为有能力行走100米,无论是借助诸如支具或助行器等辅助工具还是无需辅助。采用Kaplan-Meier方法获得精算生存曲线,以计算生存概率和保持行走的概率。在2002年9月的最后登记日期,对家长或主要照顾者进行了WeeFIM访谈以评估功能状态。WeeFIM由3个领域组成:1)自我护理,2)移动性,3)认知。自我护理领域包括8个项目,即进食、梳洗、洗澡、穿上身衣服、穿下身衣服、如厕以及膀胱和肠道管理。移动性领域包括5个项目:从椅子或轮椅转移、转移到厕所、转移到浴缸或淋浴间、行走/轮椅/爬行距离以及上下楼梯。认知领域评估理解、表达、社交互动、解决问题和记忆能力。使用1至7分的评分量表(1 = 完全协助,2 = 最大协助,3 = 中度协助,4 = 最小接触协助,5 = 监督,6 = 改良独立,7 = 完全独立)。WeeFIM的最高总分是126分,自我护理、移动性和认知的最高得分分别为56分、35分和35分。
对于I型SMA(n = 22),1年、2年、4年、10年和20年的生存概率分别为50%、40%、30%、30%和30%。对于II型SMA(n = 26),1年、2年、4年、10年和20年的生存概率分别为100%、100%、100%、92%和92%。16例I型SMA患者和4例II型SMA患者死于心肺衰竭。5例存活的I型SMA患者均依赖呼吸机。所有III型SMA患者在研究时均存活。IIIa型(发病年龄<3岁)发病后2年、4年、10年和20年保持行走的概率分别为100%、100%、81%和50%,IIIb型(发病年龄在3至30岁之间)分别为100%、100%、84%和68%。IIIa型和IIIb型SMA患者从疾病发作到无法行走的间隔时间分别为15.0±10.9年(均值±标准差)和21.2±11.7年。只有39例患者参与了WeeFIM访谈,因为有20例在研究时已经死亡,24例拒绝参与。参与访谈的患者(n = 39)和未参与的患者(n = 24)在发病年龄、性别或SMA类型方面未发现差异。I型SMA的WeeFIM总分均值为24%,II型为57%,IIIa型为75%,IIIb型为78%。在自我护理领域,100%的I型SMA患者和73%的II型SMA患者需要协助,而IIIa型和IIIb型SMA患者中分别有55%和63%实现了功能独立。洗澡和穿衣(上身和下身)是大多数SMA儿童需要帮助或监督的项目。在移动性领域,超过90%的I型、II型和IIIa型SMA患者以及63%的IIIb型SMA患者需要协助。楼梯管理是所有类型SMA实现移动独立性的主要障碍。在认知领域,表现是3个领域中最好的,60%的II型SMA患者、78%的IIIa型SMA患者和90%的IIIb型SMA患者实现了功能独立。然而,除IIIb型外,很大一部分患者在解决问题方面仍需要协助或监督。I型与II型以及IIIa型与IIIb型患者的WeeFIM评分存在统计学显著差异。然而,II型和IIIa型SMA患者在总体WeeFIM评分或3个领域中的任何一个领域的表现上未观察到显著差异。
我们发现与其他研究相比,SMA患者的生存率有所提高。大多数SMA患者在移动性和自我护理领域都需要协助或监督。随着医学进步导致生存率提高,评估指定年龄时当前或有史以来的最佳功能状态可能是SMA分类的一个重要标准。