Reymond Philippe, Bodenhausen Natacha, Van Poecke Remco M P, Krishnamurthy Venkatesh, Dicke Marcel, Farmer Edward E
Gene Expression Laboratory, Plant Molecular Biology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Plant Cell. 2004 Nov;16(11):3132-47. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026120. Epub 2004 Oct 19.
Transcript patterns elicited in response to attack reveal, at the molecular level, how plants respond to aggressors. These patterns are fashioned both by inflicted physical damage as well as by biological components displayed or released by the attacker. Different types of attacking organisms might therefore be expected to elicit different transcription programs in the host. Using a large-scale DNA microarray, we characterized gene expression in damaged as well as in distal Arabidopsis thaliana leaves in response to the specialist insect, Pieris rapae. More than 100 insect-responsive genes potentially involved in defense were identified, including genes involved in pathogenesis, indole glucosinolate metabolism, detoxification and cell survival, and signal transduction. Of these 114 genes, 111 were induced in Pieris feeding, and only three were repressed. Expression patterns in distal leaves were markedly similar to those of local leaves. Analysis of wild-type and jasmonate mutant plants, coupled with jasmonate treatment, showed that between 67 and 84% of Pieris-regulated gene expression was controlled, totally or in part, by the jasmonate pathway. This was correlated with increased larval performance on the coronatine insensitive1 glabrous1 (coi1-1 gl1) mutant. Independent mutations in COI1 and GL1 led to a faster larval weight gain, but the gl1 mutation had relatively little effect on the expression of the insect-responsive genes examined. Finally, we compared transcript patterns in Arabidopis in response to larvae of the specialist P. rapae and to a generalist insect, Spodoptera littoralis. Surprisingly, given the complex nature of insect salivary components and reported differences between species, almost identical transcript profiles were observed. This study also provides a robustly characterized gene set for the further investigation of plant-insect interaction.
受到攻击后引发的转录模式在分子水平上揭示了植物对攻击者的反应方式。这些模式既由造成的物理损伤形成,也由攻击者展示或释放的生物成分形成。因此,不同类型的攻击生物可能会在宿主中引发不同的转录程序。我们使用大规模DNA微阵列,对受损以及拟南芥远端叶片中响应专食性昆虫菜粉蝶的基因表达进行了表征。鉴定出了100多个可能参与防御的昆虫响应基因,包括参与发病机制、吲哚硫代葡萄糖苷代谢、解毒和细胞存活以及信号转导的基因。在这114个基因中,有111个在菜粉蝶取食时被诱导,只有3个被抑制。远端叶片中的表达模式与局部叶片的表达模式明显相似。对野生型和茉莉酸突变体植物的分析,以及茉莉酸处理,表明67%至84%的菜粉蝶调节的基因表达全部或部分受茉莉酸途径控制。这与在冠菌素不敏感1无毛1(coi1-1 gl1)突变体上幼虫性能的提高相关。COI1和GL1中的独立突变导致幼虫体重增加更快,但gl1突变对所检测的昆虫响应基因的表达影响相对较小。最后,我们比较了拟南芥对专食性菜粉蝶幼虫和多食性昆虫斜纹夜蛾幼虫的转录模式。令人惊讶的是,考虑到昆虫唾液成分的复杂性以及报道的物种间差异,观察到了几乎相同的转录谱。这项研究还提供了一个特征明确的基因集,用于进一步研究植物 - 昆虫相互作用。