Worthington H V, Eden O B, Clarkson J E
MANDEC, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, UK, M15 6FH.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD003807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003807.pub2.
Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent and treat them. One of these side effects is oral candidiasis.
To assess the effectiveness of interventions (which may include placebo or no treatment) for the prevention of oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
Electronic databases: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, MEDLINE Pre-indexed, EMBASE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, SIGLE and LILACS were searched. Date of the most recent searches April 2004 (CENTRAL Issue 2, 2004).
Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: design - random allocation of participants; participants - anyone receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment for cancer; interventions - agents prescribed to prevent oral candidiasis; primary outcome - prevention of oral candidiasis.
Data were recorded on the following secondary outcomes if present: relief of pain, amount of analgesia, relief of dysphagia, incidence of systemic infection, duration of stay in hospital (days), cost of oral care, patient quality of life, death, use of empirical antifungal treatment, toxicity and compliance. Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two reviewers (HW & JC). The Cochrane Oral Health Group statistical guidelines were followed and relative risk values calculated using random effects models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random effects metaregression analyses.
Twenty-eight trials involving 4226 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Drugs absorbed and partially absorbed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract were found to prevent oral candidiasis when compared to a placebo, or a no treatment control group, with RR for absorbed drugs = 0.47 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.78). For absorbed drugs in populations with an incidence of 20% (mid range of results in control groups), this implies a NNT of 9 (95% CI 7 to 13) patients need to be treated to avoid one patient getting oral candidiasis. There was no significant benefit shown for drugs not absorbed from the GI tract.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence, from randomised controlled trials, that drugs absorbed or partially absorbed from the GI tract prevent oral candidiasis in patients receiving treatment for cancer. There is also evidence that these drugs are significantly better at preventing oral candidiasis than drugs not absorbed from the GI.
癌症治疗越来越有效,但会带来短期和长期的副作用。尽管使用了多种药物来预防和治疗口腔副作用,但口腔副作用仍然是疾病的主要来源之一。其中一种副作用是口腔念珠菌病。
评估干预措施(可能包括安慰剂或不治疗)对接受化疗和/或放疗的癌症患者预防口腔念珠菌病的有效性。
检索了电子数据库:Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、医学期刊预索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、癌症文献数据库、科技灰色文献数据库和拉丁美洲及加勒比地区卫生科学文献数据库。最近一次检索日期为2004年4月(Cochrane系统评价数据库2004年第2期)。
符合以下标准的试验被选中:设计——参与者随机分配;参与者——任何接受癌症化疗或放疗的人;干预措施——用于预防口腔念珠菌病的药物;主要结局——预防口腔念珠菌病。
如有以下次要结局数据则进行记录:疼痛缓解、镇痛量、吞咽困难缓解、全身感染发生率、住院天数、口腔护理费用、患者生活质量、死亡、经验性抗真菌治疗的使用、毒性和依从性。两名评价者(HW和JC)独立重复提取有关方法、参与者、干预措施、结局指标和结果的信息。遵循Cochrane口腔健康组的统计指南,使用随机效应模型计算相对危险度值。在随机效应Meta回归分析中检查潜在的异质性来源。
28项试验涉及4226名患者,符合纳入标准。与安慰剂或不治疗对照组相比,发现从胃肠道(GI)吸收和部分吸收的药物可预防口腔念珠菌病,吸收药物的RR = 0.47(95%CI 0.29至0.78)。对于发病率为20%(对照组结果的中位数范围)的人群中的吸收药物,这意味着需要治疗9名(95%CI 7至13)患者才能避免1名患者发生口腔念珠菌病。未显示从胃肠道未吸收的药物有显著益处。
随机对照试验有强有力的证据表明,从胃肠道吸收或部分吸收的药物可预防接受癌症治疗患者的口腔念珠菌病。也有证据表明,这些药物在预防口腔念珠菌病方面比未从胃肠道吸收的药物显著更好。