Clarkson J E, Worthington H V, Eden O B
Mackenzie Building, Dental Health Services Research Unit, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, UK, DD2 4BF.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;2007(1):CD003807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003807.pub3.
Treatment of cancer is increasingly more effective but is associated with short and long term side effects. Oral side effects remain a major source of illness despite the use of a variety of agents to prevent and treat them. One of these side effects is oral candidiasis.
To assess the effectiveness of interventions (which may include placebo or no treatment) for the prevention of oral candidiasis for patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy or both.
Computerised searches of Cochrane Oral Health Group and PAPAS Trials Registers, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CANCERLIT, SIGLE and LILACS were undertaken. Reference lists from relevant articles were searched and the authors of eligible trials were contacted to identify trials and obtain additional information. Date of the most recent searches: June 2006: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 2).
Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: design - random allocation of participants; participants - anyone receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment for cancer; interventions - agents prescribed to prevent oral candidiasis; primary outcome - prevention of oral candidiasis.
Data were recorded on the following secondary outcomes if present: relief of pain, amount of analgesia, relief of dysphagia, incidence of systemic infection, duration of stay in hospital (days), cost of oral care, patient quality of life, death, use of empirical antifungal treatment, toxicity and compliance. Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. The Cochrane Oral Health Group statistical guidelines were followed and risk ratios (RR) calculated using random-effects models. Potential sources of heterogeneity were examined in random-effects metaregression analyses.
Twenty-eight trials involving 4226 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Drugs absorbed and partially absorbed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract were found to prevent oral candidiasis when compared to a placebo, or a no treatment control group, with RR for absorbed drugs = 0.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.78). For absorbed drugs in populations with an incidence of 20% (mid range of results in control groups), this implies a NNT of 9 (95% CI 7 to 13) patients need to be treated to avoid one patient getting oral candidiasis. There was no significant benefit shown for drugs not absorbed from the GI tract.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence, from randomised controlled trials, that drugs absorbed or partially absorbed from the GI tract prevent oral candidiasis in patients receiving treatment for cancer. There is also evidence that these drugs are significantly better at preventing oral candidiasis than drugs not absorbed from the GI.
癌症治疗越来越有效,但会带来短期和长期的副作用。尽管使用了多种药物来预防和治疗口腔副作用,但口腔副作用仍然是患病的主要来源之一。其中一种副作用是口腔念珠菌病。
评估干预措施(可能包括安慰剂或不治疗)对接受化疗或放疗或两者的癌症患者预防口腔念珠菌病的有效性。
对Cochrane口腔健康小组和PAPAS试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、癌症文献数据库、灰色文献数据库和拉丁美洲及加勒比地区健康科学文献数据库进行了计算机检索。检索了相关文章的参考文献列表,并联系了符合条件的试验的作者以识别试验并获取更多信息。最近一次检索日期:2006年6月:Cochrane系统评价数据库(Cochrane图书馆2006年第2期)。
如果试验符合以下标准,则选择该试验:设计 - 参与者随机分配;参与者 - 任何接受癌症化疗或放疗的人;干预措施 - 用于预防口腔念珠菌病的药物;主要结局 - 预防口腔念珠菌病。
如果有以下次要结局的数据,则进行记录:疼痛缓解、镇痛量、吞咽困难缓解、全身感染发生率、住院天数、口腔护理费用、患者生活质量、死亡、经验性抗真菌治疗的使用、毒性和依从性。两名综述作者独立、重复地提取了有关方法、参与者、干预措施、结局测量和结果的信息。遵循Cochrane口腔健康小组的统计指南,并使用随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)。在随机效应Meta回归分析中检查了异质性的潜在来源。
28项涉及4226名患者的试验符合纳入标准。与安慰剂或不治疗对照组相比,发现从胃肠道(GI)吸收和部分吸收的药物可预防口腔念珠菌病,吸收药物的RR = 0.47(95%置信区间(CI)0.29至0.78)。对于发病率为20%(对照组结果的中位数范围)的人群中的吸收药物,这意味着需要治疗9名(95%CI 7至13)患者才能避免1名患者发生口腔念珠菌病。未显示从胃肠道不吸收的药物有显著益处。
随机对照试验有强有力的证据表明,从胃肠道吸收或部分吸收的药物可预防接受癌症治疗的患者发生口腔念珠菌病。也有证据表明,这些药物在预防口腔念珠菌病方面比不从胃肠道吸收的药物明显更好。