Pappalardo Gelsomina, Amodeo Aldo, Pandolfi Marco, Wandinger Ulla, Ansmann Albert, Bösenberg Jens, Matthias Volker, Amiridis Vassilis, De Tomasi Ferdinando, Frioud Max, Larlori Marco, Komguem Leonce, Papayannis Alexandros, Rocadenbosch Francesc, Wang Xuan
Istituto di Metodologie per l'Analisi Ambientale, Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche, Contrada S Loja, 85050 Tito Scalo (Potenza), Italy.
Appl Opt. 2004 Oct 1;43(28):5370-85. doi: 10.1364/ao.43.005370.
An intercomparison of the algorithms used to retrieve aerosol extinction and backscatter starting from Raman lidar signals has been performed by 11 groups of lidar scientists involved in the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET). This intercomparison is part of an extended quality assurance program performed on aerosol lidars in the EARLINET. Lidar instruments and aerosol backscatter algorithms were tested separately. The Raman lidar algorithms were tested by use of synthetic lidar data, simulated at 355, 532, 386, and 607 nm, with realistic experimental and atmospheric conditions taken into account. The intercomparison demonstrates that the data-handling procedures used by all the lidar groups provide satisfactory results. Extinction profiles show mean deviations from the correct solution within 10% in the planetary boundary layer (PBL), and backscatter profiles, retrieved by use of algorithms based on the combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar technique, show mean deviations from solutions within 20% up to 2 km. The intercomparison was also carried out for the lidar ratio and produced profiles that show a mean deviation from the solution within 20% in the PBL. The mean value of this parameter was also calculated within a lofted aerosol layer at higher altitudes that is representative of typical layers related to special events such as Saharan dust outbreaks, forest fires, and volcanic eruptions. Here deviations were within 15%.
欧洲气溶胶研究激光雷达网络(EARLINET)的11个激光雷达科研团队对从拉曼激光雷达信号中反演气溶胶消光和后向散射所使用的算法进行了相互比较。此次相互比较是EARLINET对气溶胶激光雷达开展的扩展质量保证计划的一部分。激光雷达仪器和气溶胶后向散射算法分别进行了测试。拉曼激光雷达算法通过使用在355、532、386和607纳米波长下模拟的合成激光雷达数据进行测试,同时考虑了实际的实验和大气条件。相互比较结果表明,所有激光雷达团队所采用的数据处理程序都给出了令人满意的结果。在行星边界层(PBL)中,消光廓线与正确解的平均偏差在10%以内;利用基于拉曼弹性后向散射激光雷达技术组合算法反演得到的后向散射廓线,在高达2千米的范围内与解的平均偏差在20%以内。还对激光雷达比进行了相互比较,得到的廓线显示在行星边界层中与解的平均偏差在20%以内。在较高海拔处一个代表撒哈拉沙尘暴发、森林火灾和火山喷发等特殊事件典型气溶胶质层的抬升气溶胶质层内,也计算了该参数的平均值,此处偏差在15%以内。