Cheung Vincent Y T, Constantinescu Oana C, Ahluwalia Birinder S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario M2K 1E1, Canada.
J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Nov;23(11):1441-7. doi: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.11.1441.
To evaluate the appearance of the lower uterine segment (LUS) in pregnant women with previous cesarean delivery and to compare the LUS thickness with that in women with unscarred uteri.
In a prospective study, sonographic examination was performed on 53 pregnant women with previous cesarean delivery (cesarean group), 40 nulliparas (nullip-control), and 40 women who had 1 or more childbirths with unscarred uteri (multip-control) between 36 and 38 weeks' gestation to assess the appearance and compare the thickness of the LUS. In the cesarean group, the sonographic findings were correlated with the delivery outcome and the intraoperative LUS appearance.
In the cesarean group, 44 patients (83.0%) had a normal-appearing LUS indistinguishable from that of control groups; 2 patients (3.8%) had an LUS defect suggestive of dehiscence; and 7 patients (13.2%) had thickened areas of increased echogenicity with or without myometrial thinning. Although the cesarean group had a thinner LUS (1.9 +/- 1.4 mm) when compared with both the nullip-control group (2.3 +/- 1.1 mm; P > .05) and the multip-control group (3.4 +/- 2.2 mm; P < .001), only the latter difference achieved statistical significance. One of the 2 patients who had a sonographically suspected LUS defect had confirmed uterine dehiscence during surgery. An intraoperatively diagnosed paper-thin LUS, when compared with an LUS of normal thickness, had significantly smaller sonographic LUS measurements (1.1 +/- 0.6 versus 2.0 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively; P = .004).
Prior cesarean delivery is associated with a sonographically thinner LUS when compared with those with prior vaginal delivery. Prenatal sonographic examination is potentially capable of diagnosing a uterine defect and determining the degree of LUS thinning in patients with previous cesarean delivery.
评估有剖宫产史孕妇的子宫下段(LUS)表现,并将LUS厚度与未留瘢痕子宫的女性进行比较。
在一项前瞻性研究中,对53例有剖宫产史的孕妇(剖宫产组)、40例未产妇(未产妇对照组)和40例有1次或多次分娩且子宫未留瘢痕的女性(经产妇对照组)在妊娠36至38周进行超声检查,以评估LUS表现并比较其厚度。在剖宫产组中,将超声检查结果与分娩结局及术中LUS表现相关联。
在剖宫产组中,44例患者(83.0%)的LUS外观正常,与对照组难以区分;2例患者(3.8%)的LUS有缺损,提示子宫裂开;7例患者(13.2%)有回声增强的增厚区域,伴或不伴有肌层变薄。尽管剖宫产组的LUS较薄(1.9±1.4mm),与未产妇对照组(2.3±1.1mm;P>.05)和经产妇对照组(3.4±2.2mm;P<.001)相比,但只有后一种差异具有统计学意义。超声怀疑LUS缺损的2例患者中,有1例在手术中证实子宫裂开。术中诊断为纸样薄的LUS与正常厚度的LUS相比,超声测量的LUS明显更小(分别为1.1±0.6与2.0±0.8mm;P=.004)。
与有阴道分娩史的女性相比,既往剖宫产与超声显示的较薄LUS相关。产前超声检查有可能诊断子宫缺损并确定有剖宫产史患者的LUS变薄程度。