Suppr超能文献

[子宫下段试验:一项实用的开放性多中心随机试验]

[Lower Uterine Segment Trial: A pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial].

作者信息

Rozenberg P, Deruelle P, Sénat M-V, Desbrière R, Winer N, Simon E, Ville Y, Kayem G, Boutron I

机构信息

Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, centre hospitalier Poissy-Saint-Germain, rue du Champ-Gaillard, 78303 Poissy cedex, France; Unité de recherche EA7285, université Versailles-St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France.

Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Maternité Jeanne-de-Flandre, Lille, France.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Apr;46(4):427-432. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The data from literature show that trial of labor and elective repeat cesarean delivery after a prior cesarean delivery both present significant risks and benefits, and these risks and benefits differ for the woman and her fetus. The benefits to the woman can be at the expense of her fetus and vice-versa. This uncertainty is compounded by the scarcity of high-level evidence that preclude accurate quantification of the risks and benefits that could help provide a fair counseling about a trial of labor and elective repeat cesarean delivery. An interesting way of research is to evaluate the potential benefits of a decision rule associated to the ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment (LUS). Indeed, ultrasonography may be helpful in determining a specific risk for a given patient by measuring the thickness of the LUS, i,e, the thickness of the cesarean delivery scar area. Although only small and often methodologically biased data have been published, they look promising as their results are concordant: ultrasonographic measurements of the LUS thickness is highly correlated with the intraoperative findings at cesarean delivery. Furthermore, the thinner the LUS becomes on ultrasound, the higher the likelihood of a defect in the LUS. Finally, ultrasound assessment of LUS has an excellent negative predictive value for the risk of uterine defect. Therefore, this exam associated with a rule of decision could help to reduce the rate of elective repeat cesarean delivery and especially to reduce the fetal and maternal mortality and morbidity related to trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a pragmatic open multicenter randomized trial with two parallel arms. Randomization will be centralized and computerized. Since blindness is impossible, an adjudication committee will evaluate the components of the primary composite outcome in order to avoid evaluation bias. An interim analysis will be planned mid-strength of the trial. Ultrasound will be performed by expert sonographers after certification by the main investigator. Women aged 18 years or older are eligible for this trial if they have a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation at a gestational age from 36 to 38 weeks, a previous low transverse cesarean delivery and sign the informed consent sheet. Women will be asked to participate in this study when they reach a term of 36 to 38 weeks of gestation. After agreement, women will be randomized into two groups: in the study group, they will have the LUS measured by ultrasound and the patient will be informed that, based on a threshold value of 3.5mm for the ultrasound measurement of the LUS thickness, the patient with a higher measurement will be considered at low risk and will be encouraged to choose a trial of labor whereas the patient with a measurement is equal to or less than this threshold will be considered at risk and encouraged to choose an elective repeat cesarean; in the control group, ultrasound LUS measurement will not be performed. The mode of delivery will be decided according to standard practice at the center. The primary composite outcome will include: uterine rupture, uterine dehiscence, hysterectomy, thromboembolic complications, transfusion, endometritis, maternal mortality, fetal prenatal and intrapartum mortality, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and neonatal mortality.

DISCUSSION

This trial assesses the efficacy of ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment in women with a prior cesarean delivery in reducing fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality and it will provide evidence in order to establish clinical recommendations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01916044 (date of registration: 5 August 2013).

摘要

背景

文献数据表明,剖宫产后试产和选择性再次剖宫产均存在显著风险和益处,且这些风险和益处在产妇及其胎儿身上有所不同。对产妇的益处可能以其胎儿为代价,反之亦然。由于缺乏高级别证据,难以准确量化风险和益处,无法为试产和选择性再次剖宫产提供合理的咨询建议,这使得这种不确定性更加复杂。一种有趣的研究方法是评估与子宫下段超声测量相关的决策规则的潜在益处。事实上,超声检查通过测量子宫下段厚度(即剖宫产瘢痕区域的厚度),可能有助于确定特定患者的风险。尽管目前仅发表了少量且往往在方法上存在偏差的数据,但这些数据看起来很有前景,因为其结果一致:子宫下段厚度的超声测量与剖宫产术中发现高度相关。此外,超声显示子宫下段越薄,子宫下段出现缺陷的可能性越高。最后,子宫下段的超声评估对子宫缺陷风险具有出色的阴性预测价值。因此,这项与决策规则相关的检查有助于降低选择性再次剖宫产率,特别是降低剖宫产后试产相关的胎儿和产妇死亡率及发病率。

方法/设计:这是一项实用的开放性多中心随机试验,有两个平行组。随机分组将集中进行并通过计算机操作。由于无法实现盲法,将设立一个判定委员会来评估主要复合结局的各项指标,以避免评估偏倚。将在试验进行到一半时计划进行中期分析。超声检查将由经过主要研究者认证的专业超声医师进行。年龄在18岁及以上、单胎头位妊娠、孕周为36至38周、有过一次低位横切口剖宫产且签署知情同意书的女性符合本试验条件。女性在妊娠36至38周时将被邀请参与本研究。达成一致后,女性将被随机分为两组:在研究组中,她们将接受子宫下段超声测量,并告知患者,根据子宫下段厚度超声测量的阈值3.5毫米,测量值较高的患者将被视为低风险,鼓励其选择试产,而测量值等于或低于该阈值的患者将被视为有风险,鼓励其选择选择性再次剖宫产;在对照组中,不进行子宫下段超声测量。分娩方式将根据中心的标准操作来决定。主要复合结局将包括:子宫破裂、子宫裂开、子宫切除、血栓栓塞并发症、输血、子宫内膜炎、产妇死亡、胎儿产前和产时死亡、缺氧缺血性脑病和新生儿死亡。

讨论

本试验评估了对有剖宫产史的女性进行子宫下段超声测量在降低胎儿和产妇发病率及死亡率方面的疗效,并将为制定临床建议提供证据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01916044(注册日期:2013年8月5日)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验