Suppr超能文献

在环境研究中用于化合物特异性δ¹³C分析的单糖衍生化过程中碳添加的最小化。

Minimization of carbon addition during derivatization of monosaccharides for compound-specific delta13C analysis in environmental research.

作者信息

Gross Simone, Glaser Bruno

机构信息

Institute of Soil Science and Soil Geography, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany.

出版信息

Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18(22):2753-64. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1684.

Abstract

Little is known about the delta13C composition of monosaccharides representing the largest carbon reservoir in the biosphere. The main reason for this might be that monosaccharides have to be derivatized prior to gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS) analyses and that a large isotopic correction is necessary for the carbon that has to be added to the original molecule during derivatization, resulting in large uncertainty of the calculated delta13C values of individual monosaccharides. The amount of added derivatization carbon is twice (alditol acetates) or even three times (trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatives) as high as the amount of the original monosaccharide carbon. In addition, isotope fractionation occurs during acetylation. Therefore, the objectives of this study were (i) to minimize carbon addition during derivatization for GC/C/IRMS measurements of monosaccharides in soil and sediment samples and (ii) to quantify improvements in accuracy and precision of the final results. Minimization of carbon addition was accomplished by derivatization with methylboronic acid (MBA) and TMS thereafter (MBA method). Monosaccharides derivatized with the MBA method instead of TMS reduced the number of added carbon atoms from 2.2-2.7 to 0.3-0.8 per sugar carbon atom. Although the precision of GC/C/IRMS measurements with both methods is comparable (about 0.3 per thousand), delta13C values of an internal standard indicated that the newly developed MBA method is about 2 per thousand more accurate than the TMS method. delta13C comparison between soil samples that differed only slightly in their bulk carbon isotope signature showed that the MBA method is better in proving these small differences on a significant level. Total precision of the whole MBA method including all analytical and calculation steps is better by a factor of almost three than the TMS method.

摘要

关于代表生物圈中最大碳库的单糖的δ13C组成,人们所知甚少。造成这种情况的主要原因可能是,单糖在进行气相色谱/燃烧/同位素比率质谱(GC/C/IRMS)分析之前必须进行衍生化处理,并且在衍生化过程中必须添加到原始分子中的碳需要进行大量的同位素校正,这导致单个单糖的计算δ13C值存在很大的不确定性。添加的衍生化碳的量是原始单糖碳量的两倍(糖醇乙酸酯)甚至三倍(三甲基硅烷基(TMS)衍生物)。此外,乙酰化过程中会发生同位素分馏。因此,本研究的目标是:(i)在对土壤和沉积物样品中的单糖进行GC/C/IRMS测量时,尽量减少衍生化过程中的碳添加量;(ii)量化最终结果在准确性和精密度方面的提高。通过用甲基硼酸(MBA)进行衍生化然后再用TMS(MBA方法)来实现碳添加量的最小化。用MBA方法而非TMS衍生化的单糖,每个糖碳原子添加的碳原子数从2.2 - 2.7减少到了0.3 - 0.8。尽管两种方法的GC/C/IRMS测量精密度相当(约为千分之0.3),但内标物的δ13C值表明,新开发的MBA方法比TMS方法的准确性高出约千分之2。对整体碳同位素特征仅略有不同的土壤样品进行的δ13C比较表明,MBA方法在显著水平上更能很好地证明这些微小差异。包括所有分析和计算步骤的整个MBA方法的总精密度比TMS方法提高了近三倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验