• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚的疾病基金是否在挑选参保对象?一项分析及政策改进建议。

Are Colombian sickness funds cream skimming enrollees? An analysis with suggestions for policy improvement.

作者信息

Trujillo Antonio J, McCalla Dawn C

机构信息

Health Services Administration, University of Central Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Policy Anal Manage. 2004 Aug;23(4):873-88. doi: 10.1002/pam.20052.

DOI:10.1002/pam.20052
PMID:15499708
Abstract

One of the primary objectives of Colombian social health insurance reform was to increase competition among for-profit insurers. Unfortunately, the flat capitated formula creates an opportunity for sickness funds to maximize reimbursement gains by cream skimming--selecting against unhealthy individuals. This paper explores sickness fund selection behavior to evaluate the efficiency losses associated with the introduction of managed competition in Colombia. Data from a 1997 Colombian household survey are analyzed with a bivariate probit model with partial observability using instrumental variables. The model yields some evidence of sickness fund selection based on health status. Public policy options to discourage risk selection by health status are discussed.

摘要

哥伦比亚社会医疗保险改革的主要目标之一是增强营利性保险公司之间的竞争。不幸的是,统一的人均费用公式为疾病基金通过撇脂策略(即排斥不健康个体)来最大化报销收益创造了机会。本文探讨疾病基金的选择行为,以评估与在哥伦比亚引入管理式竞争相关的效率损失。利用工具变量,通过具有部分可观测性的双变量概率模型对1997年哥伦比亚家庭调查的数据进行了分析。该模型得出了一些基于健康状况进行疾病基金选择的证据。文中还讨论了抑制按健康状况进行风险选择的公共政策选项。

相似文献

1
Are Colombian sickness funds cream skimming enrollees? An analysis with suggestions for policy improvement.哥伦比亚的疾病基金是否在挑选参保对象?一项分析及政策改进建议。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2004 Aug;23(4):873-88. doi: 10.1002/pam.20052.
2
Medical care use and selection in a social health insurance with an equalization fund: evidence from Colombia.设有均衡基金的社会医疗保险中的医疗服务利用与选择:来自哥伦比亚的证据
Health Econ. 2003 Mar;12(3):231-46. doi: 10.1002/hec.711.
3
[Notes on the planned German health fund model].[关于德国健康基金计划模式的注释]
Gesundheitswesen. 2006 Oct;68(10):650-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927175.
4
Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: 6 years later.欧洲的风险调整与风险选择:6年后
Health Policy. 2007 Oct;83(2-3):162-79. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.12.004. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
5
Cream-skimming, incentives for efficiency and payment system.撇脂、效率激励与支付系统。
J Health Econ. 2003 May;22(3):419-43. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00119-4.
6
Mandatory high-risk pooling: an approach to reducing incentives for cream skimming.强制性高风险集合:一种减少撇脂动机的方法。
Inquiry. 1996 Summer;33(2):133-43.
7
Biased selection within the social health insurance market in Colombia.
Health Policy. 2006 Dec;79(2-3):313-24. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.01.010. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
8
German risk structure compensation: enhancing equity and effectiveness.德国风险结构补偿:增强公平性与有效性。
Inquiry. 1995 Fall;32(3):300-9.
9
Managing risk selection incentives in health sector reforms.在卫生部门改革中管理风险选择激励措施。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1999 Oct-Dec;14(4):287-311. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199910/12)14:4<287::AID-HPM560>3.0.CO;2-V.
10
Who switches sickness funds in Israel?在以色列,谁会更换疾病保险基金?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Jul;2(Pt 3):251-65. doi: 10.1017/S1744133107004100.